Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McShay has us trading picks moving from 8th to 7th with Detroit to pick Lance

panthers55

By panthers55,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Herbert said:

Well when you asked the question you didnt mention Lance and Fields being on the board. (Most likely won't happen). Cant be moving the goal posts now. Broncos could easily trade with them for pretty cheap and snatch the last of the big 4.

 

It would cost a lot to move up to get the last qb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 minutes ago, Mr. Herbert said:

Well when you asked the question you didnt mention Lance and Fields being on the board. (Most likely won't happen). Cant be moving the goal posts now. Broncos could easily trade with them for pretty cheap and snatch the last of the big 4.

 

If he said that the first 3 picks were Trevor, Wilson and Jones and didn't mention another one and it is Detroit's pick at 7 the reasonable thing to think is that the rest are on the board and that includes Lance and Fields.  I guess what you call changing the goal posts, I would call reading comprehension and simple logic. My response was to the question of whether we would make the move if we thought someone else would jump ahead. I told him why I wouldn't make the trade at that point either. No one talked about something before that. Try to keep up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Herbert Apprentice

Mr. Herbert

Posted
Posted
Just now, panthers55 said:

If he said that the first 3 picks were Trevor, Wilson and Jones and didn't mention another one and it is Detroit's pick at 7 the reasonable thing to think is that the rest are on the board and that includes Lance and Fields.  I guess what you call changing the goal posts, I would call reading comprehension and simple logic. My response was to the question of whether we would make the move if we thought someone else would jump ahead. I told him why I wouldn't make the trade at that point either. No one talked about something before that. Try to keep up.

Hell of an assumption there Nostradamus!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

So to beat out other leapfroggers (Den, WFT) to get Lance, we'd have to give up a lot, seeing as how Detroit has all the cards with multiple teams calling.

 

Hard pass.

The difference with us is that they'd be able to pick up an additional pick and still get the same player they would've gotten at #7. They'd be gaining something while giving up nothing. With other teams' offers they would get more trade compensation but they very well may be giving up the player they wanted at #7 too.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jorgie Collaborator

Jorgie

Posted
Posted

Why would we take lance when fields has as good an arm, better intermediate route passer, just as good if not better athlete.

If Fields had that Alabama team this wouldn’t even be a conversation.

If the panthers land Justin at #8 I’m dancin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Jorgie said:

Why would we take lance when fields has as good an arm, better intermediate route passer, just as good if not better athlete.

If Fields had that Alabama team this wouldn’t even be a conversation.

If the panthers land Justin at #8 I’m dancin

It's very possible and honestly quite likely that we have one ranked significantly above the other as prospects. I'm torn on which way I'd go there, but I'm leaning hard toward Fields. Tough as a fan to make a call there though because so much of that evaluation comes from the interviews with the players and their coaches to determine how well they're going to translate to the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riverboat Ron Mentor

Riverboat Ron

Posted
Posted

I don't understand the logic in saying Lance will be there at #7.

1. Jax- Trevor Lawrence 

2. NYJ- Zach Wilson

3. SF- Justin Fields or Trey Lance

4. (Trade)- Justin Fields or Trey Lance

 

I hate to say it but this is definitely what's going to happen. Mac isn't going #3, dude is getting a lot of fake hype. That leaves teams like Carolina, Denver Washington and New England vying for #4 or settling on Mac.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By CRA · Posted

      Just had his best game? The Panthers did have their best win in terms of quality of opponent.  Reality is, Bryce Young was treated like a backup QB for almost the entire game vs the Rams.   It's yet another example of a long run of oddities come to life for Bryce on  the year.  Almost this weird The Golden Calf of Bristol season weirdness where it clearly is not good QB play but randomness resulting in a random season overall.  Canales frankly called 2 really dumb calls on 4th down and it worked out terrifically.  I mean, credit Bryce for making the plays, sure.   But I don't think 2 wild gambles really erase everything else.  I mean, take out the 4th down oddities and he was at 130 yards on the day (with a lot of YAC). 
    • kungfoodude
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I mean, did Bryce ever become a prince for more than a game or two at a time?    I am not advocating in any way, shape or form for Sanders as a starter. If he was available for nickels and could compete in camp, I would be fine having him. I don't view him as any sort of savior and he is another guy that has some legit physical limitations and a TON of work to do getting faster and more decisive with his reads. I can't say given sample size he is better than Bryce....yet. But that ain't much in the way of bars to clear. Hence why I am so perplexed by the Kyler arguments here. I mean.....who in the world would even question the fact that he is a better QB than Bryce? And, once again, that doesn't make him good. It makes him better than one of the worst starting QB's in the past 5 or so years.
    • TD alt
      Go after Shedeur this offseason.

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, you probably should've waited after the season is over before "going there," that way we we'd have four more games of comparison and discussion. Don't get me wrong, I occasionally go out on a limb, but Bryce just had his best game and has given people hope (which could realistically be false hope), and Shedeur just doesn't have that many games under his belt (even if he does look promising), one of them being against the Titans. No harm in being patient and letting things play out.  If you noticed, Tepper seems to be taking a wait-and-see attitude, and he didn't mention Bryce in the clip in the other thread. I'm still highly skeptical of Bryce (and glad that Sanders has shown an ounce of success), but the reality is that we have to let things play out. The Sanders train left long ago (if it was even here). But,there are more realistic options if Bryce turns back into a frog.
×
×
  • Create New...