Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Sewell is drafted before #8...


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If Sewell is gone at 8, I say we trade back no further than 15.  We should be able to get either Slater or Darisaw still and possibly pick up an extra 2nd in the process.

I dunno...

Both the Chargers and especially the Vikings could go tackle. 

If they have Darrisaw as LT2 and really like him, take him at 8. Left tackle has been a massive need for way too long. 

But again, all depends what their board looks like. If they have 3-4 guys lumped in there closely then it makes sense to trade back but if Darrisaw is their clear #2... just take him 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I dunno...

Both the Chargers and especially the Vikings could go tackle. 

If they have Darrisaw as LT2 and really like him, take him at 8. Left tackle has been a massive need for way too long. 

But again, all depends what their board looks like. If they have 3-4 guys lumped in there closely then it makes sense to trade back but if Darrisaw is their clear #2... just take him 

We do need a LT.  Here is what scares me--there are some good CBs that should be on the board---all of them, in fact.  There are good tackles that will be available in round 2--do we get cute and chase a CB, then "settle" at OT in round 2?  I mean, round 2 could feature Eichenberg, W. Little, Leatherwood, etc.  Not what I would do, but...

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

If Sewell is gone at 8, I say we trade back no further than 15.  We should be able to get either Slater or Darisaw still and possibly pick up an extra 2nd in the process.

The Darnold trade gives the Panthers flexibility to trade down and not feel desperate to grab a QB. We haven't seen the Panthers trade down in the 1st since 2007. I think it's time to start accumulating picks to fill out a depleted roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

Stay at 8 and get the best talent.  If we pick Parsons... great.  Shaq is a goner next year.

Not after Fritterere pushed more money into the future years.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Pitts, Chase are my picks if Sewell is gone. My personal pick is Kwity Paye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

The closer we get I am seriously warming to Pitts at 8 if Sewell is gone.  OT in round 2 and lets roll.  This offense will be seriously talented.

I cant dismiss the idea of grabbing Pitts if he is there.  The matchup problems would help Darnold

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Not after Fritterere pushed more money into the future years.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Pitts, Chase are my picks if Sewell is gone. My personal pick is Kwity Paye. 

Pitts, Sewell, and Chase are just on a level of their own.  I would throw Trevor on that pile--4 players who are the best of the best. 

If one is there, you have to have a plan to take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...