Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy only had 2 2nd-half TD passes in 2020, none after Wk 4

KSpan

By KSpan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
30 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Lets be honest shall we. You did not make this post for any other reason but..

A) To continue the shitstorm on Teddy and join the many that want to crap all over him

B) Speak up your hopefulness of Darnold (I think many are hopeful) but do so for a QB that for the most part was equally as bad in general. 

You try to disguise comparing you nearly equal piles of poo by complicating it with a nuance of comparing not only the color of the poo, but also the texture, smell, and location ( hence your mention of Brady)

But really....you just wanted to make a post of about how bad you feel Teddy is.  Congrats.

I don't need to really explain anything to you but since you're bringing it up I saw the 2 TD stat mentioned in a different discussion and, after looking it up for myself, was surprised. Looking into it further shows consistency with him, but since it's tough to separate Brady at this point and Darnold is the new guy I figured it was something worth noting for all 3 of them.

I say nothing bad about Teddy, though I did and do own my opinion of him as a player (though I also have not stated it in this thread). I have said nothing good about Darnold, who has trended down in this area throughout his career; the numbers shared in my post show that. Brady also gets very little mention when the offense's performance is discussed and while Teddy has a lot of film to draw from, Brady only has 1 year as an OC. 

You're choosing to interpret things as you are.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ready 2 Win Contributor

Ready 2 Win

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I don't need to really explain anything to you but since you're bringing it up I saw the 2 TD stat mentioned in a different discussion and, after looking it up for myself, was surprised. Looking into it further shows consistency with him, but since it's tough to separate Brady at this point and Darnold is the new guy I figured it was something worth noting for all 3 of them.

I say nothing bad about Teddy, though I did and do own my opinion of him as a player (though I also have not stated it in this thread). I have said nothing good about Darnold, who has trended down in this area throughout his career; the numbers shared in my post show that. Brady also gets very little mention when the offense's performance is discussed and while Teddy has a lot of film to draw from, Brady only has 1 year as an OC. 

You're choosing to interpret things as you are.

Agreed. I posted a gif of you beating a dead horse by telling us (as if we didn't know) how bad Teddy is. You took issue with it. Its cool. You want us to know how bad Teddy is. We got it!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, classics said:

Why should Brady be watched given you state he was working with QB who has a history of poor 2nd performance?

 

Because there isn't yet any evidence that Brady is good in his own right. In fact, Teddy was worse in terms of 2nd half TDs here in Carolina. Is that a sign that Carolina's coaching/Brady is/was deficient as well? Brady still has a lot to prove IMO and while Teddy seemingly hasn't been good in this specific area across his career, that doesn't automatically mean that Brady didn't also underperform. Just not as clear-cut with only 1 year of film.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Agreed. I posted a gif of you beating a dead horse by telling us (as if we didn't know) how bad Teddy is. You took issue with it. Its cool. You want us to know how bad Teddy is. We got it!

 

Except that's not what I said anywhere. You're the one saying that and beating the dead horse. I just posted an unusual stat, the history there, and how others may factor in/compare.

Edited by KSpan
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ready 2 Win Contributor

Ready 2 Win

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KSpan said:

Except that's not what I said anywhere. You're the one saying that and beating the dead horse. I just posted an unusual stat, the history there, and how others may factor in/compare.

And i just posted a gif. Get over it! It was my opinion of your post. If my opinion and take is right or wrong...why do you worry about it so much? You dont have to fight with random people on the internet. Pie here isnt so important. 

You made a post. I read it the way I did. I responded the way I did. Its all good. Smoke a fatty and relax bro. You dont need to win the internet every single day!

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

And i just posted a gif. Get over it! It was my opinion of your post. If my opinion and take is right or wrong...why do you worry about it so much? You dont have to fight with random people on the internet. Pie here isnt so important. 

You made a post. I read it the way I did. I responded the way I did. Its all good. Smoke a fatty and relax bro. You dont need to win the internet every single day!

 

I'm not not relaxed. When stuff is posted that doesn't make sense it may be worth responding to, so I did.

 

  • The D 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted

It brings up a more important question though, rather than just does Teddy suck. 

Should we cosider keeping T2G for a backup. The hope with any backup is that they have the ability to win a game if your starter gets hurt. These stats show that he likely isnt going to be able to come in in the 2nd half and lead the team to a win. Granted most everyone already knows this, but when considering the backup role, how much value does he even have there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigTeddyFan Rookie

BigTeddyFan

Posted
Posted

I think this highlights the need to continue to mold the team around Teddy to better take advantage of his skill set.
 

A guy who should be targeted  in the early rounds is Tutu Atwell who like Teddy attended Miami Northwestern HS and then Louisville. Teddy excels at the short/intermediate pass, and Atwell is a guy who can take it to the house from anywhere on the field.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...