Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Updates on the Falcons


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Captain Morgan said:

as long as Pitts is not in our division, I'm happy.  Especially if the Falcons spend their first rounder on a guy who sits for a year.

I think our D is better equipped to handle pitts than they would be a third stud WR or Sewell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I think she has Mac to the Niners. Was one of the first people to say it.

I said it like 43 seconds before her---but I am not petty.

 

(no, I really didn't see it until she mentioned it)= I was asking to make sure the sentiment has not changed.   I saw a survey on NFL network that showed how popular opinion had shifted from Jones to Fields--so I was curious)

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jones, Lance and Fields are all in the same realm just with very different knocks on each of them.

But personally I like Fields better than the other two. I do not like the idea of Fields going to ATL and sitting behind Ryan for a year or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I said it like 43 seconds before her---but I am not petty.

 

(no, I really didn't see it until she mentioned it)= I was asking to make sure the sentiment has not changed.   I saw a survey on NFL network that showed how popular opinion had shifted from Jones to Fields--so I was curious)

Either way, Lance to ATL makes sense, assuming they go QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...