Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person on Panthers plans for #8 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've read, I think it's probably true.

I also suspect it might be one of the reasons why Marty doesn't work here anymore.

It's not Huddle lore. Rhule said in an interview after Marty was fired that he was interested in trading down and Marty taught him that when your guy is there you need to take him (referring to Brown). Something to that effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

One thing is certain, its Surtain/Horn and then there is a gap between them and the CBs available in the later rounds

Disagree. I think Newsome and Stokes are gonna be just as good. Maybe not as soon, but with a year or two, they will be right there with them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pup McBarky said:

Disagree. I think Newsome and Stokes are gonna be just as good. Maybe not as soon, but with a year or two, they will be right there with them.

You could be right, im just speaking in terms of the draft. Nobody is taking newsome and stokes that early

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From what I've read, I think it's probably true.

I also suspect it might be one of the reasons why Marty doesn't work here anymore.

Why, because he clashed with Rhule?

I think Brown was a great pick. We desperately needed a DT and this years class is terrible.

Hopefully, Marty’s overall record of roster building is what got him fired.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When they measure velocity they base it on an average of 3 throws, I think, could be 5. Each qb decides how he throws it. It's not taken from passes in a game. So basing on an "eye test" takes out bias. It's measured by a radar gun in a controlled environment. 
    • I think the long term is when this stuff pays off. You have to set it all up and get all the big dogs on the same page.  So if you have the right guy set it up, assigning all the values, you are ahead of the game and he seems to be the top guy. Figures Tepper would be attracted to having the Top analytics guy. Okay with me I guess. If they get to the point where I am mad they didn’t kick or go for it, it means they are doing okay. Cause I haven’t thought that mattered much for several years. 
    • Velocity MPH. Okay, that’s a number in isolation. what if CJ has a nice 85% effort motion that does what he is looking for? And Young has to step into things to get even 2 mph behind him?  I don’t KNOW that about either it is just an example of numbers don’t always tell all, but when I look at Young throw it reminds me of someone like Fran Tarkenton. A throwback non athletic weak armed scrambler for those of you who don’t remember. Had a great career in the old smaller slower but much meaner NFL. Would not today, IMO.  I think the arm strength questions, are plenty fair. And the eyeball test, it does mean something. Who would take Bryce Young over CJ Stroud or Richardson based on his arm? It is obvious to the naked eye where they stack up.
×
×
  • Create New...