Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are the 49ers okay?

Raleigh PF

By Raleigh PF,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Raleigh PF Rising Star

Raleigh PF

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

I mean, this could have been the plan all along. Secure a top-3 pick (Pitts/Sewell), send them Jimmy G and some other picks and get a HOF QB that still has some tread on the tires. 

Esp if GB truly believes in Love as the QB of the future.

Fine (and I agree it's poo), but exactly what other picks would the 49ers offer? They traded their next three 1st round picks to get where they are now.

Feels like someone's been watching too much Draft Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

If they got Aaron Rodgers they would have a dynasty instantly.

Eh, no. The Bucs are the current champs and should be pretty good. Then there is the Chiefs in the AFC. Plus there are the other contenders.  On top of all that, Rodgers is starting to get up there in age(37 now). How quick will he start breaking down and falling off despite just winning the MVP award. Brady is the exception, not the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

I mean, this could have been the plan all along. Secure a top-3 pick (Pitts/Sewell), send them Jimmy G and some other picks and get a HOF QB that still has some tread on the tires. 

Esp if GB truly believes in Love as the QB of the future.

He hasn't played a single snap in the NFL...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Did Brady retire? I'm pretty sure he is still the best pure QB in the league.

Nah, he is in Tampa playing on an absolutely loaded roster. 

Rodgers > Brady.   I mean, if we are just talking about the individual.  Team success is a different story.  Tampa built a better team.  Tampa > Packers.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Nah, he is in Tampa playing on an absolutely loaded roster. 

Rodgers > Brady.   I mean, if we are just talking about the individual.  Team success is a different story.  Tampa built a better team.  Tampa > Packers.  

How many records do each of them own? How many rings? How many years of high level play? Brady > Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

How many records do each of them own? How many rings? How many years of high level play? Brady > Rodgers.

What does someone's past, their teams success and history have to do with a present day comparison of individuals? 

in 2015 Cam Newton was a better QB than Peyton Manning.  

Present day Rodgers is a better QB than Tom Brady. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CRA said:

What does someone's past, their teams success and history have to do with a present day comparison of individuals? 

in 2015 Cam Newton was a better QB than Peyton Manning.  

Present day Rodgers is a better QB than Tom Brady. 

Present day Brady just led his team and won another ring. Present day Rodgers was sitting at home watching the superbowl on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Present day Brady just led his team and won another ring. Present day Rodgers was sitting at home watching the superbowl on TV.

To be fair, that arguably has as much or more to do with the present day Packers as it does present day Rodgers.

Specifically, the present day Packers who used their first round pick on Jordan Love.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • X-Clown
      Rookies

      By X-Clown · Posted

      He’s also 21 years old. I don’t know why fiz is so eager to label him a bust
    • X-Clown
      Hoping you guys keep it up

      By X-Clown · Posted

      It’s wild to me that so many of you guys are threatened by the idea of an opposing team fan who is polite in 2025. He’s been posting here on and off for years, usually when our teams play each other which hasn’t been for a while. I’d maybe understand this treatment if it was a falcons or saints fan, but packers fans in general are one of the nicer fan bases as long as you aren’t another NFC north team (especially the bears).   
    • Mike2.0
      I'm sold on the NFL being fixed.

      By Mike2.0 · Posted

      Some players excel on the big stage, while others freeze and succumb to the pressure. I’m not convinced Cam took a dive. I think he didn’t handle the stage very well. The pressure got to him and he folded. He wouldn’t be the first quarterback or player to struggle in a Super Bowl. Two HOF examples - John Elway and Jim Kelly. The 2002 MVP, Rich Gannon, threw 5 interceptions against the Bucs. Poor performances happen.  Unless of course you believe all these players threw the games they played in, but if that occurred, surely someone by now would have admitted taking a dive? 🤷‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...