Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What in the everloving fruit of the loom croissant butter is this?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Toomers said:

That’s not a reason at all. If he’s a complete flop as he has been are you starting him next year because they gave a 2nd for him? I don’t think so. 

   No effort involved. I can site actual numbers and facts and you make up theories like the one above. It’s your calling card of ignorance and has been for a long time. 

Exactly the kind of "my opinions are facts" response I'd expect from you.

Keep trying, dude. It's at least amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Call Me James Veteran

Call Me James

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Toomers said:

You can always say so. You just can’t provide any logical reason for why it’s stupid and uninformed? I’m the one begging you to post anything that is a benefit of this. I’ve given reasons many times. If I’m so stupid and uninformed this should be easy. Yet you still can’t. Typical. Same as always. “Because someone said so” is your basis for every point. Nots facts. Not common sense. And certainly not actual football knowledge. If you had any you wouldn’t have to cling to every word you read on the internet. 

He always appeals to authority. He's a homer/bootlicker. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Varking said:

For those who dislike that we stuck with Darnold ( it’s known I wanted Fields ) compare Darnolds numbers against the Dolphins and Patriots and then compare it to everyone else. He was fine. He got completely owned by the Pats and Dolphins and he has like 16 TDs to 6 INTs in his career against the NFC, 

Its a known he sucked against the Pats and Phins. But being objective you’ll see against everyone else combined he looked like a good young QB. 

 

Dude, duck, or you'll be collateral damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

This is obviously not true.

Has been calling for Hurney's head for years

Heck, Rivera's too. And I haven't exactly been Tepper's biggest fan either.

I genuinely try not to engage some of our dimmer elements, but sometimes I fail 😆

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Call Me James Veteran

Call Me James

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Heck, Rivera's too. And I haven't exactly been Tepper's biggest fan either.

I genuinely try not to engage some of our dimmer elements, but sometimes I fail 😆

 

You're not smarter than everyone. And you avoid discussions that make you actually back. Up your claims. 

Posting a lot doesn't make you right. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Exactly the kind of "my opinions are facts" response I'd expect from you.

Keep trying, dude. It's at least amusing.

It’s not an opinion at all to say the Panthers just committed 19M more to Darnold with little to no upside. If there was any you would have posted it. That’s a fact. All I asked for was one thing. Yet you couldn’t even do that. 
 

   

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most debates with Toomers are.

That depends on your definition of sad. Pointing out something factual to pop a homer balloon from someone who called you out. Then have that person not be able to defend his point at all is very sad. And typical. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...