Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Carolina Hurricanes Game Thread


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

I know man give em two 5 on 3’s in the series. I’m only wondering what they going to give the defending Stanley Cup champions this series.

I'm hoping we are the better story or we have better refs. I mean I'm tired of teams beating the crap out of us and the league just looking away.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Round two begins at 5PM EST. Facing last years champs.

16.3k fans allowed in the house(I believe that's a league high this season). PNC is gonna be rocking!!!

I thought Bruins had a full house last night which was more. I’m glad we are getting near full capacity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your Carolina Hurricanes made the regular season our (consensual) b*tch. Best coach in the league, best goalie in the league. Our reward, do si do ing with some fake ass country music singers from the westerlands.

After taking care of business against the generic carnivorous animals from Tennysey, now we turn our sights to America's penis. And, not even the good parts (just the tip) either. No, we get to take on the herpes scar on the shaft.

That brings us to the Lightning. A team without fans for a city that's not a city. The National Weather Service doesn't declare a state of emergency for a lightning strike. Hell, Tesla mastered that poo 150 years ago. Sure, they are the defending champs. But that poo was 2020, the most miserable decade humanity has ever lived through, it was only fitting. Yeah, their greasy ass goal tender has an argument for the Vezina. But, we all know the award is going to Eugene Levy's illegitimate son. 

alex-nedeljkovic-2021-979.jpg

Canes 3 - Swamprats 1

 

Edited by Stumpy
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...