Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this number tainted?


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

well, if he has a halfway decent financial adviser...I would suspect he will be wearing 22 this year.  Making a ton of decisions like that is how you end up a NFL statistic. 

but he can do whatever he wants.  My son will just have a vintage 22 lol.  I'm too cheap to start chasing jersey changes. 

lol i'm pretty sure he's fine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

He can afford it

You think he is going to pay $1.5m just so he can wear a different number on his chest?  LOL.  He is rich, not wealthy. No one can "afford" to throw away 1.5m and getting nothing in return, except for stupid wealthy people.  Now if they could roll that 1.5m into his charity and he gets the number, maybe, as that's a tax write off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly it makes the most sense for him to put in the request now, so he can have 5 for the 2022 season. That way he doesn't have to pay for all the 22 jerseys this year and we get a full season of football to wash the bad taste that the number 5 currently has out of our mouths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, travisura said:

Honestly it makes the most sense for him to put in the request now, so he can have 5 for the 2022 season. That way he doesn't have to pay for all the 22 jerseys this year and we get a full season of football to wash the bad taste that the number 5 currently has out of our mouths.

So they wouldn't make any more 22 gear to sell for a year?  That wouldn't seem likely as I am 100% sure he is our best selling jersey number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...