Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christian McCaffrey Workload in 2021


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mike Davis is gone but in the fifth round we draft a talented RB in Chuba Hubbard. As we are all more than aware, Ron Rivera's offenses seemed to revolve around your best offensive player carrying the overwhelming bulk of the usage(see Newton, Cam for other examples). 

Interestingly, in just three games of action last year, CMC was on pace for his highest rushing usage rate yet at 19.7 rushes per game, even higher than his 17.9 rushes per game in 2019. However, his usage in the passing game dipped from his 2019 usage as he averaged just 6.3 targets per game from a high of 8.9 targets per game in 2019(7.1 TGTS/GM in 2017 and 7.8 TGTS/GM in 2018). So his overall usage rate was only 0.8 touches per game less in 2020 than 2019.

After a season which was mired with injuries and drafting a talented young RB, will we finally see CMC get spelled more? Or will his usage rate continue to climb in 2021?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m hoping the amount of touches had more to do with shitty qb play and Sam can elevate his play and not be heavily reliant on a high CMC workload. We need to get the most bang for our buck with this rb contract. If we don’t I expect him to finish out the contract with missing games from injury.

The cap hits go 14 mill 2022, 17 2024 then 17 2024. We have a chance to get out of the contract in 2024 with a 7 mill dead cap hit if the numbers I’m looking at are right. Gonna suck really bad if he’s not on the field producing. Honestly I’d like to see him moved to the slot more long term and get someone else to run more from the backfield. But that’s down the road. 

Edited by TheRumGone
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I’m a bit skeptical of Chuba. He ran through wide open holes at OKS. He’s not gonna have that luxury in the nfl. His speed his ridiculous. But I’m not sure if we have the line to make it work for him. Hopefully he can adapt, grow and be reliable. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it’s a philosophical question.  Do you use you’re best player as much as humanly possible to win, or do you put him on a pitch count and risk losing while not utilizing said best player?

Coaches are people too.  They have to do what’s in their best interest to survive.

Christian will never request fewer touches.  He will tell them he wants all the touches.  That’s what football players do. (See Newton, Cam for other examples)

I think they’ll use him depending on the situation.  If they need him to carry the load, he will.  If they don’t, hopefully that’s when we see Chubba.

But to answer the OP, I bet it all stays pretty much the same but with CMC getting spot relief in a few games where he didn’t before.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Mike Davis is gone but in the fifth round we draft a talented RB in Chuba Hubbard. As we are all more than aware, Ron Rivera's offenses seemed to revolve around your best offensive player carrying the overwhelming bulk of the usage(see Newton, Cam for other examples). 

Interestingly, in just three games of action last year, CMC was on pace for his highest rushing usage rate yet at 19.7 rushes per game, even higher than his 17.9 rushes per game in 2019. However, his usage in the passing game dipped from his 2019 usage as he averaged just 6.3 targets per game from a high of 8.9 targets per game in 2019(7.1 TGTS/GM in 2017 and 7.8 TGTS/GM in 2018). So his overall usage rate was only 0.8 touches per game less in 2020 than 2019.

After a season which was mired with injuries and drafting a talented young RB, will we finally see CMC get spelled more? Or will his usage rate continue to climb in 2021?

Selling Chuba short already?😄 He was drafted in the fourth.

I think CMC's rushing usage will purposefully be kept to somewhere between 15-20 carries per game. Although it seems hard to keep him off the field, I believe that last year was a lesson learned by the brass, and as such his load will be monitored. I believe that Chuba was drafted with spelling CMC in mind in as seamless a manner as possible because of his potential to be legitimately dynamic in his own right. He is at least as fast as CMC and can catch. I'm not sure if he's as lightning quick as CMC with the jukes (including hops), or has CMC's great field vision, but at worst he's a marked upgrade over the older and slower Mike Davis. He is dangerous once he gets to the second level, but he does run with some power, and can pick up those 5 yard runs in between the tackles.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Mike Davis is gone but in the fifth round we draft a talented RB in Chuba Hubbard. As we are all more than aware, Ron Rivera's offenses seemed to revolve around your best offensive player carrying the overwhelming bulk of the usage(see Newton, Cam for other examples). 

Interestingly, in just three games of action last year, CMC was on pace for his highest rushing usage rate yet at 19.7 rushes per game, even higher than his 17.9 rushes per game in 2019. However, his usage in the passing game dipped from his 2019 usage as he averaged just 6.3 targets per game from a high of 8.9 targets per game in 2019(7.1 TGTS/GM in 2017 and 7.8 TGTS/GM in 2018). So his overall usage rate was only 0.8 touches per game less in 2020 than 2019.

After a season which was mired with injuries and drafting a talented young RB, will we finally see CMC get spelled more? Or will his usage rate continue to climb in 2021?

Considering they benched McCaffrey when he absolutely would have been out there if we were in the middle of a playoff run, I'm leaning towards the idea that they'll spell him much more than Rivera did. 

You also might see him lined up wide more - we basically had a homeless man's version of McCaffrey eating into his snaps in Samuel.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC can get all the short passes he wants as far as I am concerned.

However those dedicated runs worry me. Tough kid but we really dont have much of a backup, and it only takes one fat lineman to fall on him in the pile for him to get hurt. I'd like to see his runs limited to 12-15

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am somewhat concerned, like many others about the amount of work CMC gets. However, I think the reason the backfield got so much work was because Rhule/Brady didn’t have the dynamic QB play they were looking for.

If Darnold can ball out, maybe the backfield touches slide a little in favor of WRs and TEs, then Chubba can get some touches, even with a healthy CMC.

Edited by KatsAzz
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheRumGone said:

I’m hoping the amount of touches had more to do with shitty qb play and Sam can elevate his play and not be heavily reliant on a high CMC workload. We need to get the most bang for our buck with this rb contract. If we don’t I expect him to finish out the contract with missing games from injury.

The cap hits go 14 mill 2022, 17 2024 then 17 2024. We have a chance to get out of the contract in 2024 with a 7 mill dead cap hit if the numbers I’m looking at are right. Gonna suck really bad if he’s not on the field producing. Honestly I’d like to see him moved to the slot more long term and get someone else to run more from the backfield. But that’s down the road. 

Well, the bulk of his work was before we knew Teddy was that bad. I am curious to see if our philosophy isn't that dissimilar from Turner in terms of running everything through him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

I guess it’s a philosophical question.  Do you use you’re best player as much as humanly possible to win, or do you put him on a pitch count and risk losing while not utilizing said best player?

Coaches are people too.  They have to do what’s in their best interest to survive.

Christian will never request fewer touches.  He will tell them he wants all the touches.  That’s what football players do. (See Newton, Cam for other examples)

I think they’ll use him depending on the situation.  If they need him to carry the load, he will.  If they don’t, hopefully that’s when we see Chubba.

But to answer the OP, I bet it all stays pretty much the same but with CMC getting spot relief in a few games where he didn’t before.

Yeah, my fear is that we continue running the wheels off him. I would like to see Hubbard get maybe 10-20% of the load(if he is capable) and maybe save some of this wear wnd tear on our most expensive offensive asset(and best offensive player).

I know RB's have short shelf lives anyway but I would like to see him preserved at least until the end of his current contract.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Selling Chuba short already?😄 He was drafted in the fourth.

I think CMC's rushing usage will purposefully be kept to somewhere between 15-20 carries per game. Although it seems hard to keep him off the field, I believe that last year was a lesson learned by the brass, and as such his load will be monitored. I believe that Chuba was drafted with spelling CMC in mind in as seamless a manner as possible because of his potential to be legitimately dynamic in his own right. He is at least as fast as CMC and can catch. I'm not sure if he's as lightning quick as CMC with the jukes (including hops), or has CMC's great field vision, but at worst he's a marked upgrade over the older and slower Mike Davis. He is dangerous once he gets to the second level, but he does run with some power, and can pick up those 5 yard runs in between the tackles.

 

I am not selling him short, moreso concerned about overusing CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are facing the dilemma of limiting his snap count the contract is already a loss. He is very talented but he has quite a few miles dating back to even Stanford so at this point the writing is on the wall. We can't go back in time but we really need production so if that means lining him up wherever to open things up for the rest of the offense do that. Surely someone will be racking up yards with the amount of offensive talent we have now.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well, the bulk of his work was before we knew Teddy was that bad. I am curious to see if our philosophy isn't that dissimilar from Turner in terms of running everything through him.

Kyle Allen and I think the coaches were well aware of teddy’s limitations beginning of last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let it all out bro.   At the end of the day Charlotte fans just aren't that passionate as other fans. The Panthers and Hornets crowds are wack.    Go to a Canes game and you will understand this. Tell the family I said hi and Happy Father's Day.
    • Dude you have no idea what you're talking about. Best place to live?  LMAO... that's your criteria...  Charlotte gets put all over those lists too... come on man... and those lists have zero to do with sports. I'm done after this bc I'm punching down intellectually here... The Panthers have been bad for 6 years now. You are obviously young and not overly educated based off the "dunks" you're putting out there that certainly are, so let me educate you today on the Panthers. The Panthers sold out for well over a decade straight. BOA has been as good an environment as there is when the team is good.  Fan support for the Panthers has been incredible when the team has even remotely reciprocated. The idea that Charlotte doesn't support the Panthers is utter BS. People in Raleigh have the biggest little brother syndrome of all time... Nobody outside of the Triangle cares about any of your "vaunted" sports team outside of Duke-UNC in basketball on a national scale. Sure, the Canes are great. But nationally, the WWE dwarfs the NHL in ratings. More people care about Cody Rhodes than Sebastian Aho... or anyone else in the NHL for that matter... I doubt less than 5% of anyone in this state outside of Raleigh even knows who that is... that's a knock on Aho who is a great player, it's just the NHL barely makes a ripple in the overall hierarchy of American sports. It's not in the same universe as the NFL or NBA no matter how badly you want to tell yourself otherwise. Raleigh is not a big-time sports city, no matter how much you want to scream into the abyss about it. Neither is Charlotte. But no one here is making such a nonsense argument... LOL it's good to be young and to be ignorant enough to be confidently wrong... WTF are you even on this board though since Charlotte is so beneath you? There is an actual discussion board on this very site for Raleigh sports since they are so superior...  Maybe it's bc I'm watching Idiocracy with my son, but your timing is perfect, my man... The dumbest among us have become the most confidence in their ignorance... God Bless America!!
    • You do know the biggest military base in the US is located just an hour from Raleigh in Fort Bragg right? Military families are family oriented. A hour drive to games is nothing compared to traveling 3 hours to Charlotte.   Cmon man there is nothing happening in Western Carolina other than Charlotte. I only go west for outdoor activities and some nature/mountain views.
×
×
  • Create New...