Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera brought Luke Kuechly in to speak to Washington linebackers

ladypanther

By ladypanther,
in Huddle Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

https://sports.yahoo.com/ron-rivera-reveals-brought-luke-030309779.htm

Quote

 

[Rivera] brought Kuechly to talk to his linebackers over the Memorial Day weekend.

What did Kuechly say to WFT’s linebackers?

According to Nicki Jhabvala of The Washington Post, he spoke of the importance of being able to play all three linebacker spots — something Rivera has stressed since Washington selected Davis in April.

 

Hope Luke was wearing a Panther shirt.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted

Some will be butthurt but they shouldn't be. 

Ron was Luke's Coach all but the final few games of his career. He grew up in the league with Rivera as his mentor. I think he mentioned there were tears when they found out Ron was getting the axe so there's a tight bond there.

Say what you will about Ron, but the dude knows linebackers/linebacking. Even our backups went on to be starters on other teams. 

Good for Luke and good for Ron. 

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I would say to not read anything into this, but if you've clicked the link to read this thread there's a good chance you already have 😕

You may be reading too much in  that.  You clicked right?  Just interesting to know what people are up to.

Edited by ladypanther
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

You may be ready too much in  that.  You clicked right?  Just interesting to know what people are up to.

Nah. I don't have a problem with it.

But given how paranoid people were that Luke was heading to Washington immediately after his retirement was announced, I'm sure some people will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Nah. I don't have a problem with it.

But given how paranoid people were that Luke was heading to Washington immediately after his retirement was announced, I'm sure some people will.

I honestly wouldn't care if he took a job elsewhere in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...