Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

Rodgers has 3 years left on a 4 year $134mil deal. To me that is ridiculous. Sign a 4 year deal, play 1 year, then act out for a new deal. And get it. Man, that is some fuged up sht.

 

Yeah, I wonder how much support he is getting from his team mates? Especially the lower tier guys just fighting for their future?

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Your logic is very one sided. It's fine for the team to exercise their leverage, but the player is juvenile to exercise his.

There is no discretionary "leverage" to be "exercised"...the terms of every NFL contract are VERY specific.  

You need to redirect your anger, the owners aren't the problem as it goes to your "concerns"...

Again, do you believe Rodgers and Watson have signed contracts which are unfair?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

There is no discretionary "leverage" to be "exercised"...the terms of every NFL contract are VERY specific.  

You need to redirect your anger, the owners aren't the problem as it goes to your "concerns"...

Again, do you believe Rodgers and Watson have signed contracts which are unfair?

Fair has nothing to do with it. You just get off on authority figures. You have a bizarre complex. Seek help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
On 7/26/2021 at 8:35 PM, Toomers said:

   The first post is from here, months before SB signed up. With word for word identical thoughts about the team being run like a TV show. 
 

  The second is from Pats board where he wants Cam to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. Much like all players should do what the owners tell them. With the username RASTAN99 much like his RASTAN66 on here. When I challenged his comments I got this. Not sure what else you need as proof? 

 

 

On the Game Day Roster
Aug 4, 2020
You do realize they have banned me repeatedly? That's why I can't post anymore.

Do you remember the guy who presented the detailed expected value calculations that supported bringing back Cam? 

Yeah that was me.

Remember the guy who kept harping on "optionality" and maintained that Tepper would for sure bring Cam back because from an "optionality" perspective it was the only logical move to make?

Yeah that was me to.

Do you remember Kyle Bailey talking on WFNZ about the concept of "optionality" for months and using it to support his position that the Panthers could & should bring Cam back?

Yeah he got that from me.

By the time I squeezed back onto the Huddle with the name similar to this one the deal for Teddy had already been made to the narrative changed. Huddle disappeared all the expected-value and optionality content, not sure why the RASTAN66 stuff was allowed to stay up.

He maybe that rastan99/66 alt, still you are giving chuck faaaaaar too much credit cause all his alts read different than sizzle. Now both could have a few alts, I dont have that energy for that level of autistic behavior...... nor to keep up with them either.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Pete Carroll on Canales (New Fox Sports Article)

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Scheme and fit matter definitely, but if you are an NFL QB (especially a talented one) there will be flashes and some signs. I think the ones that get their careers broken are in inadequate offenses (bad weapons, bad OL, no running game etc…) and a constant turnover of staff can do it. Basically what the Bears did with Fields and what we have done with Bryce so far. 
    • Jackie Lee
      Least excitment before any season?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean when Rhule was on the hot seat and finally got fired, we got pumped and Wilks truly brought some culture back to the team for a brief window. Reich came in and when he got canned there was no hope or excitement, we actually got worse and we are still kinda there until proven otherwise. Some are basically trying to sell this as BY's actual rookie year as well which doesn't exactly draw up much enthusiasm and tempers expectations whether that was their intention or not. 
    • CRA
      Pete Carroll on Canales (New Fox Sports Article)

      By CRA · Posted

      Yes, but Bryce Young is what amplifies that concern for me for a super green HC and OC.   it’s all and marriages by Tepper IMO.  Canales and the new OC probably would have a better time getting their O running with a vet QB that is a natural fit.   again, I’m not arguing Canales and Morgan should be catering to Bryce at this point.  Just pointing out how pointless drafting Bryce looks at this stage.  And I don’t disagree you either can play or can’t and the O is irrelevant at this level.   I mean fit matters at this level.  Everyone is too talented.  Fit makes or breaks careers. 
×
×
  • Create New...