Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OL is "fluid"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AndrewLaskoski said:

Please let Christensen be better than a JAG. Them valuing him over Marshall gives me some hope 

I know right.

Its clear Christensen was the target all along.  

Rhule in Panthers Confidential said: "they say hey we're gonna do the trade with you and all three guys on the board we take Christensen take the best receiver.  If they're not sure take our highest-ranked guy Terrace."  They couldn't lock it in and we took Marshal.

Only one OT was taken between Terrace and BC, that was Mayfield....and we panicked.  I guess because he was our backup if BC got taken.  When our plan B disappeared, we traded up to get BC.

What I don't understand is, they are looking at BC for RT when he played left tackle and we needed a left tackle.  They knew his wingspan was short when they drafted him.

They either

1)Think Erving, Scott, and Daley, will do fine at LT...and there's limited data to support that.

2)Think Moton may actually move left eventually with BC right.

3)Weren't communicating with someone like Pat Meyer who came back and said, "hey, he can't play left tackle, his arms are too short."

My guess is it's a combination of 1&2.

In any event, as a rookie, we need to ease him in, and playing behind our best OT  should be good for his development.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Christensen will be a good player, I'm just not sure where. Rhule has said repeatedly that he thinks he's a RT. We just signed Moton long-term to huge money. The tea leaves IMO point toward trying to convince Moton to move to LT and plugging Christensen in at RT. It's a lot easier to find serviceable interior OL than it is to find serviceable OTs. If we could solve both OT positions long-term with a rookie draft pick and a vet with a long-term contract that would go a loooooooong ways toward solving our OL problems.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Some key FA are still available….

D58B8E90-77E5-4097-B489-1B6940207DC4.jpeg

No.  Just no.  

Besides, we're stocked at guard.  They have even mentioned BC as a 2nd round guard.

On the PNP podcast Coltrain said "the whole damn line is guards"  to which Rashad  responded  "it guardians of the gd galaxy".

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Christensen will be a good player, I'm just not sure where. Rhule has said repeatedly that he thinks he's a RT. We just signed Moton long-term to huge money. The tea leaves IMO point toward trying to convince Moton to move to LT and plugging Christensen in at RT. It's a lot easier to find serviceable interior OL than it is to find serviceable OTs. If we could solve both OT positions long-term with a rookie draft pick and a vet with a long-term contract that would go a loooooooong ways toward solving our OL problems.

The big "if" is, can they both switch sides?  Moving to the pros is hard enough, then on top of it to switch sides.  Moton has handled LT before.  But he'll be uncomfortable too.  Why not just ease BC in behind Erving?

 I just don't understand that RT can have shorter arms.  I've never heard that.  We've discussed it here before...but I'm unconvinced.  It just makes no sense to me.  The one study I could find showed that shorter arms had no correlation with effectiveness, instead the study showed the opposite.  I couldn't find anything on RT vs LT arm length.   I guess they know something the rest of us don't. 

 

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Christensen will be a good player, I'm just not sure where. Rhule has said repeatedly that he thinks he's a RT. We just signed Moton long-term to huge money. The tea leaves IMO point toward trying to convince Moton to move to LT and plugging Christensen in at RT. It's a lot easier to find serviceable interior OL than it is to find serviceable OTs. If we could solve both OT positions long-term with a rookie draft pick and a vet with a long-term contract that would go a loooooooong ways toward solving our OL problems.

Has Rhule actually done that? Or did he say it once and it has been repeated endlessly here as if it were gospel? But I agree that if we have long term answers at OT in Moton and BC, regardless of L vs R, then we are way ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

 I just don't understand that RT can have shorter arms.  I've never heard that.  We've discussed it here before...but I'm unconvinced.  It just makes no sense to me.

Some of it is somewhat outdated positional prototypes. The LE playing over the RT was usually more a power rusher/run stopper type where as the RE was the speed rusher pass specialist to attack the QB from the blind side. As the NFL has become more and more pass happy, they're all pass rushers now. If you're playing on the edge in today's NFL, you HAVE to be able to effect the QB. You're practically useless if you can't. Also, somewhat of an outdated norm is that the TE typically lined up off the RT, so he had help to deal with speed off the edge so arm length was less of a necessity for RTs. The TE is basically a move position in today's NFL as likely to be split out wide, lining up on the left, or lining up in the backfield as he is to be off the RT. There really isn't much of a "strong" side anymore in today's spread formations. The priority on LT in today's NFL really just boils down to that's a right handed QB's blindside. He can simply see pressure coming from his right side better, so put your best pass protector at LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That offense last year was so predictable. I really don't know what the strategy was in the end. Did Frank not trust his qb? Did he not want the qb they selected? Did he not want a rookie at all? What the actual fug was the plan? He wasn't going to work on his qb's mechanics until year 2? What the actual fug is that kind of development? I have never seen a team go so sideways as this team did last year. I mean they weren't winning much anyway because the rest of the team was ass but damn! At least do something to show you give a damn.
    • Powerful leg but the clip alluded to him missing a chip shot. They might have a new kicker but let's see how he does in preseason. 
    • My perception/opinion of the draft based on a few categories.  Solid draft in my opinion.  Addressing need with perceived roster upgrade:  A Got WR the team desperately needed, a solid pass catching RB and upgraded TE and LB positions with what could be contributors.  Value of players drafted: B- My non-expert ignorant opinion on Legette is he was a bit of a reach.  Full disclosure though, I thought Adonai Mitchell and Jackson Powers Johnson were solid first rounders and a lot of GM's and scouts disagreed.    Brooks being hurt is a question mark/flag for me.  Draft savvy:  A+ Moving up to first for the 5th year option was a smart move with little to no downside.  After that Morgan basically stole a 2nd round pick next year and still got his guy in the process.  Also seems to have kept consistency with that "dawg" mentality the FO has been pushing.
×
×
  • Create New...