Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

High Profile CB on the Trade Block


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

 

Jaguars shopping former top-10 pick C.J. Henderson just one year after drafting cornerback, per report

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/jaguars-shopping-former-top-10-pick-c-j-henderson-just-one-year-after-drafting-cornerback-per-report/

 

He was picked top ten in last years draft, would you guys take on chance on him?

 

 

Edited by shaq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

He’s not that good, why would they be trading him already. Huge red flags!

His rookie season wasn't that bad outside of him missing 8 games, he was operating as their cb 1. Also this is the Jaguars so you really never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only thing I can think of for Jax, no red flags involved, is they are happy with their corners and want picks or a player to help out TL. Maybe some OL help or a WR. Maybe picks for next year hoping to double down in the top 10. But with Henderson missing half the season, I don't really see them getting a partner that would be in the top half of the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If a guy is being shopped a year after being a top 10 picks, that's got red flags all over it. 

It totally does have a lot of red flags, I couldn’t agree more it’s just an interesting situation. You really don’t hear teams trading their top ten pick a year later often. Urban Meyer seems like a strange coach, that’s one of the big reasons I would be interested taking advantage of a Bill O Brian type of guy.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

The dead money next year if the Saints trade Michael Thomas would be insane. With that said, I keep seeing people suggest Thomas for CJ and a pick 

That would be a super interesting trade, both MT and CJ got character concerns. Lawrence with MT could be leathal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...