Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team discipline


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

...didn't look too great today.

Today's coverage was peppered with stories like this.

Gotta imagine Rhule is pissed after saying yesterday that today would be better on that front. Of course, it'll be up to him to do something about it.

With all that said though, I like that the guys are standing up for themselves and their own. And admittedly, this gives me a bit of an evil grin 😁

 

This is the single dumbest post you've ever made.

There is nothing wrong with enforcing retribution on teammates or other teams in practice. 

It has zero correlation to fights in games.

I'd expound but I'm working and way behind schedule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

This is the single dumbest post you've ever made.

There is nothing wrong with enforcing retribution on teammates or other teams in practice. 

It has zero correlation to fights in games.

I'd expound but I'm working and way behind schedule. 

You're not someone I'd expect to get it, so no problem 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

It's really hard to get a clear picture of anything based on tweets. They're too short, the people making them have bias and they want to get attention.

Twitter turns every sentence in to something you are supposed to have some side you need to take on it.

It's concerning most aren't aware of how limited a view you are getting from them.

I don't touch Twitter for this reason. The closest I come to "tweeting" is bitching during the gameday threads on here.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

...didn't look too great today.

Today's coverage was peppered with stories like this.

Gotta imagine Rhule is pissed after saying yesterday that today would be better on that front. Of course, it'll be up to him to do something about it.

With all that said though, I like that the guys are standing up for themselves and their own. And admittedly, this gives me a bit of an evil grin 😁

 

Honestly, Scot, that remark is decidedly benign. It's nothing. It's almost juvenile in nature, like "I'm gonna show you!" It was obviously some fan talking smack, and Miller essentially saying, "We'll see on the field."

As for the fisticuffs, I'm glad Rhule basically is of the mindset that "boys will be boys." No harm, no foul.

It was a good practice, especially when juxtaposed against the tentative display on Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

I don't touch Twitter for this reason. The closest I come to "tweeting" is bitching during the gameday threads on here.

People lose their poo in judgments to every one of them. Even the cherry picked quotes when you can easily read or watch entire transcripts to get the full picture.

I don't understand spending your day on the Huddle hand ringing over tweets but not reading articles or watching interviews before getting bent out of shape.

Edited by Moo Daeng
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Honestly, Scot, that remark is decidedly benign. It's nothing. It's almost juvenile in nature, like "I'm gonna show you!" It was obviously some fan talking smack, and Miller essentially saying, "We'll see on the field."

As for the fisticuffs, I'm glad Rhule basically is of the mindset that "boys will be boys." No harm, no foul.

It was a good practice, especially when juxtaposed against the tentative display on Thursday.

From what I've read, the fan apparently said "just play football" (likely in reference to all the fighting).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good this group has some fight in them. That should help the locker room gel. But you still need some leadership so cooler heads prevail and guys don't get tossed from games or suspended. It doesn't take much for a little scrap to escalate and flags start flying and personal fouls handed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...