Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Colts Gameday Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Looking forward to watching the kids fight for their professional lives. Who can excel under pressure, who seems to shy away. I love watching these kids play.

 

Also, anticipating who will be the first Huddler to say; "Welp, if we're counting on any backups playing. We aren't winning many games.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

newton_david.png&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

David NewtonESPN Staff Writer 

As mentioned, most of the starters won't play today for the Panthers in Indianapolis. Here's a look at the expected offensive starters: OFFENSE LT Trent Scott LG Matt Kaskey C Sam Tecklenburg RG Deonte Brown RT Brady Christensen TE Tommy Tremble TE Colin Thompson WR Terrace Marshall Jr. WR Brandon Zylstra RB Chuba Hubbard (CHOO-buh) QB PJ Walker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

I'm not sure what's so confusing about the situation. We've seen the depth chart. We've seen the starting lineup for today.

He said we wouldn't see starters because they got their reps on Thurs and Friday and cuts are coming early week.

That's what we are seeing happen.

We've heard the reasoning. Doesn't mean anyone is right or wrong yet. It is peculiar though regardless of the scrimmages earlier in the week. Horn isn't going to face a light workload in this division with the likes of Brady and Ryan twice a year.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

newton_david.png&w=160&h=160&scale=crop

David NewtonESPN Staff Writer 

Big opportunity for Panthers' rookie Chuba Hubbard to step forward in the battle to be Christian McCaffrey's backup at running back. Rodney Smith and Reggie Bonnafon also are in the mix but both are a little banged up. Smith had been getting a lot of second-team reps. Hubbard's most impressive moment during camp may have been on Friday when he made a long kickoff return in a joint practice against the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

I can see that I suppose as he isn't a rook. Yet T Marshall and B Christensen but no J Horn? Agree that preseason is becoming less and less neccessary for risk but if our first rounder can't even see some action why even put either of the first 3 picks out there? We got the Taints week 2 these fellas are going to get tested early.

Meh, I wouldn’t compare those two to horn, horn is gonna have a much bigger impact on the roster than those two. Also,  No one is worried about the taints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Meh, I wouldn’t compare those two to horn, horn is gonna have a much bigger impact on the roster than those two. Also,  No one is worried about the taints.

Well they stand in the way of second in the division rn so I assure you someone in Carolina considers them relevant.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

I have a great feeling Marshall going make our QBs look great first half, chuba going break +20 yards run...

 

I really want to see those two in action. Especially Chubba, since he won't see the field much during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...