Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers and WR Robby Anderson have agreed to a 2-year, $29.5 million extension, per source.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good signing. 

You can't have too many talented WR's. 

(didn't bother to read through the thread that had some here with a sky-is-falling attitude just 'cause they didn't like the contract numbers, like it was their money that was being given away to Robbie or something)

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I would say 10 per year is the max. DJ is a 12-15 per year receiver.


You guys need to adjust your expectations.

DJ Moore’s 5th year option is 11 mil.

Keenan Allen is making 20.

DJ will be up there. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lotta dead cap space dropping off the books. Keep Anderson here for 3 more seasons and send him on his way--

For those of you who say this gives Moore leverage--No letting Anderson walk after this season gives Moore leverage.

We can keep Moore for 2 more years at a decent salary--three if you get spendy.  Maybe they want to see what Marshall and Shi Smith have before paying Moore. 

I think this was smart.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

22+ at this point. So by paying a lower albeit productive player 30~ we are only going to drive up DJ’s price in house. When we probably could have locked him down long term for 18-20. 


Elite WR money is $22+ a year avg.

Robbie is 12.5.

DJ is getting 11 mil next year at the end of his rookie contract.

I bet DJ averages out at 21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Elite WR money is $22+ a year avg.

Robbie is 12.5.

DJ is getting 11 mil next year at the end of his rookie contract.

I bet DJ averages out at 21.

It means no extension. That’s the point. Ya we can keep him around for 2-3 years. But If we get that far he’s gonna make TOP dollar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

22+ at this point. So by paying a lower albeit productive player 30~ we are only going to drive up DJ’s price in house. When we probably could have locked him down long term for 18-20. 

Lol this extension will have no impact on DJ's negotiations.  It's laughable that you think his agent is gonna use Robby's middle-of-the-road contract as a baseline for negotiations...he was always gonna use the Hopkins/Julio/Keenan Allen/Tyreek Hill type contracts as the starting point.  You think his agent is gonna be like "Well....Robby got $12.5 million/year and we both know DJ Moore is at least 75% better than Robby, so we want $22 million/year".  Modest contracts don't set the market for players like DJ Moore.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

No it wasn't...

it’s just basic business.   Protection.  Robby blows his ACL week 1….he gets fugged if his agent didn’t get that deal done.  

that’s not a new concept.  It’s been talked about for decades in the NFL.  

and it’s great for Robbie.  He has a good agent.   One that looked out for Robby’s best interest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

it’s just basic business.   Protection.  Robby blows his ACL week 1….he gets fugged if his agent didn’t get that deal done.  

that’s not a new concept.  It’s been talked about for decades in the NFL.  

and it’s great for Robbie.  He has a good agent.   One that looked out for Robby’s best interest.  

It's just basic fan speculation with no actual roots in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...