Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

As of this moment there are 10 rookies on the Panthers roster


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Clicheking said:

I always wanted to have a big draft with 10+ draft picks like all the "smart teams" do. I said after the draft if we hit on 6 of these players meaning they are starters/solid contributors it would go along way in facilitating our rebuild.......time will tell, but so far so good

It is also an excellent way to keep the cap down, having lots of players on rookie contracts, wheeling and dealing players that are going to demand a lot of cap space to remain on the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Zod said:
77 G 6-4 350 23 R Alabama
 
Brady Christensen 70 T 6-6 300 24 R BYU
 
Jaycee Horn 8 CB 6-1 200 21 R South Carolina
 
Phil Hoskins 71 DT 6-5 280 24 R Kentucky
 
Chuba Hubbard 30 RB 6-1 210 22 R Oklahoma State
 
Terrace Marshall Jr. 88 WR 6-2 200 21 R LSU
 
Daviyon Nixon 94 DT 6-3 305 22 R Iowa
 
Shi Smith 12 WR 5-10 190 22 R South Carolina
 
Keith Taylor 28 CB 6-3 195 22 R Washington
 
Tommy Tremble 82 TE 6-4 250 21 R Notre Dame

Add 6 more from 2020 and our talent base is getting younger.  Pride is on IR so he's not included but he would make 7. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I thought that too but how do you explain Ian Thomas?  

I don't think any blanket statement applies to what we are doing. It's not like Rivera where he seemed to have some very inflexible rules and principles. I think Rhule and Co. seem to have a general framework for what they want to achieve but with some case by case flexibility built in to achieve it.

But....we also don't have the track record and information to discern trends on this coaching staff yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

How?

Realistically, the start of this teams competitive window opens next year if they’re able to take another step forward this season.

This year you want to see 7-9 wins. 7 wouldn’t be the best of leaps but it’s progress. Pending on how we lose those games I suppose. 

Next year you want to see them flirting with one of those wildcard spots or just sneaking in.

Then we’ll have all these rookies going into year 3 ready to make a real push hopefully. 

He didn't say bad long term.  It's not good short term however.  When has a team with a bunch of super young players gone on to do anything (college or pros)?  Most rookies don't pan out, even if they did make the roster year 1.  We need players that have been in the NFL for 3 years. Lets judge this again next year and see how many of those rookies make 53 in 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

After a couple decades of 1 and done drafts, this is strange and foreign to me.  
 

You’re telling me, we could have added more than 1 rookie at a time?

I don’t know sounds like a bunch of hooey, a fad, like this spider net or web world or whatever the kids are playing checkers on these days.  Slackers.

Pie for spider net. 

That is the post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...