Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule vs Saleh


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, NAS said:

For full transparency, here is the NFL defensive coordinator/assistant to NFL head coach record.  Only 9 out of 26 had winning records, or about 33%.  It's probably worse if you include offensive coaches.  That's at approximately the same rate as college to NFL (3 out of 10).

Wade Phillips (82-64)

Steve Spagnuolo (11-41)

Matt Patricia (13-29-1)

Dan Quinn (43-42)

Rex Ryan (61-66)

Todd Bowles (24-40)

Bill Arnsparger (7-28)

Dom Capers (48-80)

Bill Belichick (274-126)

Buddy Ryan (55-55-1)

Eric Mangini (33-47)

Rod Marinelli (10-38)

Romeo Crennel (32-63)

Jim Schwartz (29-51)

Brian Flores (15-17)

Mike Zimmer (64-47-1)

Mike Vrabel (29-19)

Vic Fangio (12-20)

Ron Rivera (83-72-1)

Steve Wilks (3-13)

Chuck Pagano (53-43)

Mike Pettine (10-22)

Mike Tomlin (145-78-1)

Vance Joseph (11-21)

Marvin Lewis (131-122-3)

Leslie Frazier (21-32-1)

got to expand it out beyond just winning records too. Look at the losers.   How many of those coaches got more than 1 shot at being a HC.  That's part of the equation.  A Romeo Crennel, a Dom Capers, a Buddy Ryan all get second shots because they are NFL guys who stay in the league. 

Saleh would go back to being a DC for a minute if he doesn't succeed at attempt #1.  Like a Josh McDaniels did.  Wait for his second chance.  Rhule isn't going to go be a NFL coordinator most likely and hang around.  Which lowers his odds of NFL success. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CRA said:

Saleh would go back to being a DC for a minute if he doesn't succeed at attempt #1.  Like a Josh McDaniels did.  Wait for his second chance.  Rhule isn't going to go be a NFL coordinator most likely and hang around. 

That's a fair point, if they don't succeed with their current teams, Saleh is in a better position to get another shot at it.  I do think Rhule is in a better situation in Carolina to implement his program.  Saleh has the better QB situation though, at least for now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Yeah and he coached the Jets. Poor coach at that point and poor team. I was thinking of him and Belicheck when I said this.


Fun fact. When Carrol became the Seahawks HC, people complained that he was turning the org into ‘USC North’ because of the former Trojans he kept bringing in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Fun fact. When Carrol became the Seahawks HC, people complained that he was turning the org into ‘USC North’ because of the former Trojans he kept bringing in.

 

Almost every college head coach gets this thrown at them. The Baylor/Temple thing doesn't bother me. It only lasts so long anyway because the pool of guys they know(pre-NFL) grows smaller and smaller as the years pass.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

This is malarkey. The criticism stems from going from that guy to Teddy two yards and only mustering a single divisional victory. If Rhule brings the wins there will be few if any complaints. But it's his show. Not Cam Newton's not Luke Kuechly's not any former Panther you want to drag into this. The buck stops with the head coach. Ask Ron Rivera. Rhule and Fitt need some success in a big way for '21. This oline better hold up.

So where's the criticism coming from then?

Our roster last year, pre-Draft, was horrendous. We relied heavily on Brown, Chinn, YGM and Roy. Pride played, but was in and out of the lineup.

He's not a magician. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

and that is a list that contains some of the best college football had to offer.   And Rhule wasn't a Saban, Spurrier, Kelly, etc tier college coach. 

 

Wasn't he? Seems to me he turned two programmes around and turned them into 10+ game winners and was then poached by the Panthers - the Jets interviewed him the previous year and the Giants wanted to interview him too. He was very much on the rise as a HC and had a lot of success behind him.

Saban's talent is having his mate as the head of the NCAA. He just cheats and stacks his rosters / coaching staff. You saw what he achieved with a level playing field in Miami. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

So where's the criticism coming from then?

Our roster last year, pre-Draft, was horrendous. We relied heavily on Brown, Chinn, YGM and Roy. Pride played, but was in and out of the lineup.

He's not a magician. 

Criticism happens to every coach across every sport on every team. Fans are fans it's a results driven business. Rarely are new head coaches given the reins to a franchise already in great shape. Yet the issue that has been a thorn in our side for many years remains. The oline. All that matters is which direction the team is trending by the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Wasn't he? Seems to me he turned two programmes around and turned them into 10+ game winners and was then poached by the Panthers - the Jets interviewed him the previous year and the Giants wanted to interview him too. He was very much on the rise as a HC and had a lot of success behind him.

Saban's talent is having his mate as the head of the NCAA. He just cheats and stacks his rosters / coaching staff. You saw what he achieved with a level playing field in Miami. 

No, he never had the kind of success those guys did. Predominantly because he wasn't a coach very long, even in college and went from one program to the next. Remember, his college winning percentage was only 0.522. That's because he built and then bolted.

It could easily be argued that is a more valuable trait than going to a college power and succeeding but not all those coaches who came in had a stacked deck at every place they were successful in college.

IMO, college success isn't a great predictor of NFL success(to be clear: I have NOT vetted this statement statistically) because the reasons for success in college football don't translate to the NFL. Same sport, but vast differences. It's like comparing NASCAR success to NHRA success. Both racing but completely different kinds.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Wasn't he? Seems to me he turned two programmes around and turned them into 10+ game winners and was then poached by the Panthers - the Jets interviewed him the previous year and the Giants wanted to interview him too. He was very much on the rise as a HC and had a lot of success behind him.

Saban's talent is having his mate as the head of the NCAA. He just cheats and stacks his rosters / coaching staff. You saw what he achieved with a level playing field in Miami. 

No.  Matt Rhule isn't on par with Kelly, Saban, Spurrier in terms of being a college coach.   He might be a better NFL one.  

Matt Rhule was almost a .500 coach in college and pulled off 1 conference title in his career.  He did pull teams out of the gutter and make them respectable.    But they basically just beat who they were suppose to beat and lost to everyone else. 

Rhule wasn't a Hall of Fame caliber college coach.  Other 3 are. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...