Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Erving is gonna get Darnold injured


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Darknight said:

I thought the offensive line did well today.

they played significantly worse than the stat line will look IMO, but I'm no expert.

just looked like there was penetration on every passing play, and Darnold had to get the ball out in ~2.5s every single play to avoid a sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

about the OL---when you are ahead and can mix up the offense, fine.  But when we are behind and passing it down the field is our only option--we have not seen that yet.  I reserve judgement.   Not happy with Paradis, Elf, and Erving.  Daley got beat a few times as well (gave up a sack) but he is not used to RG.

Question:  Why did they not move Daley to LG and Scott to RG when Elf got hurt?  At least Daley is familiar with LG--instead, we had 2 OL out of position (Daley, Scott) if you think about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, stbugs said:

You are correct. I think the run blocking was fine but Darnold dumped the ball off and threw almost everything quickly. Any time he had to go deeper, he was under pressure and Darnold stood tall and even got out of the pocket and threw it away. The OL is a problem. The one real long throw was Darnold moving around to avoid the pressure and using his arm strength to hit Anderson.

Anyone watching could see that Brady 100% game planned around the OL weakness.

Same as last season. Our scheme covers up a lot of their flaws.

Hence why I somewhat believe they don't put a high priority on OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It will be really interesting to see how both sides handle this. I'm sure the team would love to get him signed to a 4 year deal based on his output so far and some potential factored in, i.e. something like a 4 year $30 million contract.  But I could see his agent telling him the best path is to take the one year offer, put up a big year next year and then really cash in. The team also has to keep in mind T-Mac's 2nd contract, which likely will happen after the 2027 season assuming he keeps improving as expected.  Even if we could get him on a budget 4 year deal for what he could become, the problem then becomes when he wants to re-negotiate in 2 years during the same summer we will extend T-Mac, and you don't want to spend that much on WRs in one offseason, just see the Bengals this last year. Taking everything into consideration, I'm thinking the 1 year deal and then getting him to sign a 4-5 year deal after hopefully say a 800ish yard season next year might be best for our cap situation and separate his and T-Mac's negotiation periods.
    • And yet jax made it no further than we did, and its very possible the Pats don't either. I think it speaks more to the overall down year for the nfl as far as having great/dominant teams, every team this year has fatal flaws that can be exploited 
    • Ehhh I agree the nfc is stronger this year but their really werent any truly dominant teams this year everyone is flawed, I think the narrative for the NFL this year will to try ahd force a Josh Allen SB win
×
×
  • Create New...