Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive team stats - impressive


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Last year Snow did a lot of 3 man rushes where we dropped everyone back and hoped we could apply pressure. They never ever seemed to work. I don't remember seeing any of those yesterday. Am I misrembering? If not I'll take it that's just an adjustment that Snow made. The pressure worked yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Zach Wilson completed 15 of 21 passes for 149 yards, a touchdown, and an interception when not facing pressure in Week 1 against Carolina. 

No QB was pressured more often than Wilson in Week 1. The Jets offensive line was overwhelmed time and again against a middling Panthers front seven.  

 

 

Leaving this here.

"Middling" is just going to be the type of respect that media groups based in NYC/large markets will give a young, small market team.

If we duplicate that performance next week against the Saints it will be because Crablegs is a "middling" QB and not because this defense has some elite talent

Even during the 15-1 season we got the "who have they played?" caveat on a lot of analysis. 

I'd prefer to sneak up and blindside the media with a "Middling" roundhouse punch of reality when this dynamic defense is top 10 or higher. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CarolinaLivin said:

Regardless... We are playing the Saints and Rodgers doesn't play on the Saints and definitely doesn't play on the defensive side of the ball. I saw 10 QB pressures (0 TFL, 0 sacks) and I saw 5 TD's still being thrown with 0 turnovers. 

Im not sure how our secondary compares to the Packers. I mean I know we can and will generate pressure, but you have to think Sean Payton is really putting Winston in the best position. 

Still, I think if we can limit Kamara and force Winston to make more throws than he did against the packers that is the key. 

Did you watch or glance at the stat lines? Certainly should have had a RedZone INT negated by a completely BS Roughing the passer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Did you watch or glance at the stat lines? Certainly should have had a RedZone INT negated by a completely BS Roughing the passer.

Didn't watch the game. I apologize should've said that. And i wasn't trying to word it like I was. I just want a little insight on what we expect to see next week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Didn't watch the game. I apologize should've said that. And i wasn't trying to word it like I was. I just want a little insight on what we expect to see next week. 

This negated a RedZone interception and allowed a TD....

 

Winston was as unimpressive as you can be throwing 5TDs under 150 passing yards two should be INTs.... and of course it didn't hurt that Rodgers playing like he just didn't care handed them the ball in the RedZone twice.

 

 

 

Edited by TrevorLaurenceTime22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

This negated a RedZone interception and allowed a TD....

 

Winston was as unimpressive as you can be throwing 5TDs under 150 passing yards two should be INTs.... and of course it didn't hurt that Rodgers playing like he just didn't care handed then the ball in the RedZone twice.

 

 

 

I guess everything I saw was just highlights and overreaction to 5TDs. Or maybe the topic is just focused on Rodgers play. Thanks for the info and post. I definitely never saw this play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

This negated a RedZone interception and allowed a TD....

 

Winston was as unimpressive as you can be throwing 5TDs under 150 passing yards two should be INTs.... and of course it didn't hurt that Rodgers playing like he just didn't care handed then the ball in the RedZone twice.

 

 

 

That reminds me, I was pleasantly surprised they didn't throw a flag on that Derrick Brown sack for "putting his weight on the QB" or whatever.  Not that I think it was warranted, but that awful addition to the roughing the passer penalty has been used ridiculously these past couple seasons, including at least once or twice against us.  Especially since Wilson looked visibly hurt after that.  Maybe he's not old enough to get that call yet lol.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I guess everything I saw was just highlights and overreaction to 5TDs. Or maybe the topic is just focused on Rodgers play. Thanks for the info and post. I definitely never saw this play. 

No worries man, I don't think the Saints were nearly as impressive as some think they were Jameis was Jameis.... and the pack let them run wild stop the run and make Jameis throw and you will still see good results.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

That reminds me, I was pleasantly surprised they didn't throw a flag on that Derrick Brown sack for "putting his weight on the QB" or whatever.  Not that I think it was warranted, but that awful addition to the roughing the passer penalty has been used ridiculously these past couple seasons, including at least once or twice against us.  Especially since Wilson looked visibly hurt after that.  Maybe he's not old enough to get that call yet lol.

I had the same thought, especially with YGM piggy backing. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Jameis had a great game.  Yeah the INT that got called back wasn't great, but he still played better than a lot of people expected.  If Sam had the same game you guys would be talking about how great it was, that he threw 5 TDs, only did what was asked of him, etc.

Jameis Winston has had 5td games before the thing is he's just as likely to throw 5 interceptions. He had two that should have been INTs one of which would have docked him a TD.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NAS said:

I think we're third for total yards allowed

Should have been first if it wasn’t for the ghost of Ron Rivera taking over Matt Rhule in the second half.

I am tired of watch soft weak ass zone defense get gashed in the second half when we have any type of lead year after year, regardless of who’s coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...