Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Cosell on Sam Darnold


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I remember it was said multiple times during the Rivera era that other teams had said we pretty much did exactly what we did week in and week out without adjusting or changing much at all, and just expected the game to come down to our out-executing our opponent.  And in addition to rigged officiating, that's probably the next biggest reason we lost the Superbowl.  A very archaic philosophy if you ask me, but that had pretty much who we've been throughout our history.

It just means Ron and his crew weren't creative enough to adapt to changes in game situations or the evolving offensives or defenses in the league. 

"We run what we run until you stop it".  What doesn't say is that if you stop it he still keeps doing it hoping no one else can.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It just means Ron and his crew weren't creative enough to adapt to changes in game situations or the evolving offensives or defenses in the league. 

"We run what we run until you stop it".  What doesn't say is that if you stop it he still keeps doing it hoping no one else can.

While I'm a big fan of forcing your opponent to adapt to what you're doing, when they do, you've got to have a counter response ready to go.  As we all witnessed in our last Super Bowl, Ron didn't have a Plan B.  You've always got to have a Plan B.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Peppers90 NC said:
  • Cowboys have not played one snap of base defense through 3 games, They are a nickel defense (93% of defensive snaps) with 10 snaps of dime

  • Cowboys high percentage cover 1 versus Eagles, It was their coverage foundation – Through 3 games only the Dolphins have played more 

smash mouth these fools. 

Cover 1 can actually be tough to run against because it allows 8 men in the box.

It’s not necessarily your DB count that dictates your ability to stop the run but it can be your alignment.

Base with 2 deep safeties and 7 in the box or nickel wish single high safety with 8 in the box, which is easier to run against.

My guess is they load the box to stop the run and play man to try and take away the easy throws for Sam.  Look for them to try and force Sam into those intermediate routes.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

It just means Ron and his crew weren't creative enough to adapt to changes in game situations or the evolving offensives or defenses in the league. 

"We run what we run until you stop it".  What doesn't say is that if you stop it he still keeps doing it hoping no one else can.

Each week in the NFL is a unique challenge.  Rivera used the same tools to address each and every game.  When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OldhamA said:

If you look at how much his accuracy and footwork has improved in 3 months with Sean Ryan it's pretty evident that he was getting by on minimal coaching and talent whilst at USC and the NYJ. 

He just seems incredibly coachable

This. I was going to say much the same thing. I believe his ceiling is higher than people think. He's 24. Hasn't played QB very long. Has never been properly coached and he's learning a new system. The progress he's made in such a short time with this staff plus is general attitude leads me to believe that he could become a very good QB in a couple of years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

I don’t think the rookies are close to being able to evaluate them. Lawrence’s season may look very close to Manning’s. Peyton led the league in interceptions (more than his TDs), a sub 60% completion, a pretty bad team and a lot of throwing. Not sold on Meyer at all either. That said, Wilson is not in a great spot and Fields has a terrible coach. Mac Jones might be the one in the best position to succeed but he needs time as well. I don’t know if Lance has even thrown a ball. Way too early.

I agree it's early,  but what do you think the Huddle would look like if Fields went for 350/3 last week?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam is playing better that I thought he could this season and this early. That said plenty for him to improve on and Greg is right like most times. Reminder than the OL is playing like late 20s level and Sam is still moving the ball along with getting a couple scores each game. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea first year in this system so unless a team is stupid enough to hire Brady as their HC we'll get to see him in this system for a little bit. He still has room and time to improve being only 24 he still has quite the cap to reach his ceiling quite frankly.

There is still something to worry about obvioulsy with the fumbles/fumble potential but also a lot of that is due to poo OL. If we had a top OL flaws like Darnolds don't manifest hardly at all so that is another obvious way to help him or any QB that we may get.

The OL is still poo so the fact that he isnt' a dumpster fire poo show is honestly remarkable and can give us lots to look forward to if we can hit on some OL talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time respecting Cosells opinion just simply because he's been horribly wrong a bunch with QBs. He was pretty much one of the only guys out there breaking down football in the early 2000s but man when he said Cam wasn't going to be as good as Blaine Gabbert that was it for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...