Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meanwhile, over at that other expansion team...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

That may be true, but she was fine for a guy his age.

Idk where you're going with the second statement. You're saying the neckbeard OL does better?

You ever seen a professional athlete with a wife that looks like she fell out the ugly tree? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

 I don’t think he will be back next year and will probably be at USC. 

Doubt it, particularly after the Kiffin and Sarkisian fiasco/embarrassment. Meyer is much worse, if that is even possible, with more baggage?  With our female  President?  
 

The character baggage, and his attitude on the media, not allowing access to his players (in Florida and OSU), would not fly in a city and school in the second largest media market, with highly ranked schools in communications, cinema and news-  it would never fly.  He’d be swooning on the sideline, he’s not tough enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

That woman probably has the IQ of a garage door. 
 

if you think a 60 year old rich celebrity football coach can “pull some fine tail” wait until you see what a fat neck bearded offensive lineman can score 

im not a doctor but it’s almost like being rich and a celebrity can add inches to your cannoli 

Money hides a lot of ugly for some people. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all know it was just probably his granddaughter and he was supervising her party festivities to make sure he dance moves remained in line with his bible he belted out there in the media........

He is a good college football coach but does seem like somewhat of a piece of dookie. Not on the level of a rapist Ben Rottenburger or like he would help chop someone's head off at a super bowl then cover it up like a Ray Lewis but still a piece of dookie none the less. I'm not even saying I am without sin and haven't been a piece of crap a time or two in my life as well buthe does seem like controversy follows him for some reason and I doubt he is an always innocent victim in the wrong place at the wrong time in everything he does. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...