Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They are really pushing the Diggs shutdown Moore narrative


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

I guessed you missed the tweets I posted. But yeah Diggs is extremely lucky Darnold didn’t hit those plays Moore had him beat all game long

Nope, not at all, saw both.  Which is why I pointed it out.  DJ Moore is not mentioned in either one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

I guessed you missed the tweets I posted. But yeah Diggs is extremely lucky Darnold didn’t hit those plays Moore had him beat all game long

I don't see any mention of Moore.  Are there more tweets that aren't loading on my phone or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

I don't see any mention of Moore.  Are there more tweets that aren't loading on my phone or something?

It basically what they are inclining considering the fact Diggs was on Moore the whole game. 
 

not that hard to understand 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

It basically what they are inclining considering the fact Diggs was on Moore the whole game. 
 

not that hard to understand 

Inclining?  Like, sliding down a hill inclining?  Sorta how this conversation is going?

I think you mean imply, or perhaps insinuate.

In either case, you're wrong.  Couldn't be more wrong really.  Moore is never mentioned, this is fact.  Further, there is never even a mention of Diggs "following the Carolina #1" or . . . anything resembling it.

In point of fact, Sam was 8/12 for 113 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT throwing to DJ yesterday.  I think you'd struggle to find anyone who would back the idea that a receiver who had that stat line got "shut down".  Let alone a media member.

In point of fact, if Diggs was supposed to be shadowing Moore yesterday, he did a very poor job of it.

I'd love to see something even remotely resembling an implication such as the one you spectacularly put in the title of the thread here.  Because that guy would look like a fool quite quickly.  DJ got his yesterday.  Only someone in total denial could claim otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

Inclining?  Like, sliding down a hill inclining?  Sorta how this conversation is going?

I think you mean imply, or perhaps insinuate.

In either case, you're wrong.  Couldn't be more wrong really.  Moore is never mentioned, this is fact.  Further, there is never even a mention of Diggs "following the Carolina #1" or . . . anything resembling it.

In point of fact, Sam was 8/12 for 113 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT throwing to DJ yesterday.  I think you'd struggle to find anyone who would back the idea that a receiver who had that stat line got "shut down".  Let alone a media member.

In point of fact, if Diggs was supposed to be shadowing Moore yesterday, he did a very poor job of it.

I'd love to see something even remotely resembling an implication such as the one you spectacularly put in the title of the thread here.  Because that guy would look like a fool quite quickly.  DJ got his yesterday.  Only someone in total denial could claim otherwise.

Are you blind or you don’t see that Werner tweet. Which is a blatant lie

 

Here’s video evidence of Moore cooking Diggs 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CRA said:

DJ Moore did whatever he wanted to do.  

Sam’s first pick was just a dumb throw.  Despite the announcers saying it was to Anderson I felt it was actually to Marshall.  But that wasn’t so much a great defensive play but Darnold being bad.   One of those trademark Charles Godfrey type INTs.  You just happen to be where a bad ball was coming.  

2nd INT was a good play on the ball.   Credit there.  But again, that wasn’t to DJ.  

Agreed.  1st INT was 2020 NY Jets Sam Darnold unfortunately.    He's got to get those out of his system but it's only been 4 games into the season so we'll see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Waldo said:

PFF CB grades are some of the worst. Oline is close. Nothing to see here unless you have a double didget IQ.

It wasn't a CB that fugged Sarnold, it was his line and training when under presser he got in NJ for 3 years.

Damn.  A post by you?    That's rare to see but anyway....

I agree that it was his unfortunate experience in NY that played a factor.   

ESPECIALLY on the first INT.   That was just a bad decision on his part.

Some here say he had his arm pulled..I looked closely as much as I could but couldn't see anyone grab his arm or anything.   I think he may have misread the route that one of his targets was going to go (Zigged when he should've Zagged, if you will) or something like that.

He needs to get on the same damn page with ALL the receivers, not just DJ!!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Damn.  A post by you?    That's rare to see but anyway....

I agree that it was his unfortunate experience in NY that played a factor.   

ESPECIALLY on the first INT.   That was just a bad decision on his part.

Some here say he had his arm pulled..I looked closely as much as I could but couldn't see anyone grab his arm or anything.   I think he may have misread the route that one of his targets was going to go (Zigged when he should've Zagged, if you will) or something like that.

He needs to get on the same damn page with ALL the receivers, not just DJ!!   

I tried to wait till week six but it's obvious what we are this year so good enough.

Darnold is who he has always been and at this point in year 4, it's who he is going to be. His coaching is better and NJ is a toxic dump of a team. I still don't belive in him long term and I'm not going to any games this year because I already sat through enough Jake games. Home is way more entertaining and enjoyable for me.  Darnold has a very obvious ceiling but I get it, you are a big time fan of his. It's  peak 2006 Panthers to me at this point, if you know you know.

His support will play a big roll in where he plays in his spectrum of quality. They failed him on Sunday big time, yet not surprisingly considering the matchups. The interior was completely awful and the OTs where slightly less bad. As the football continues to get better in quality this year that's going to be a huge problem for that unit if they don't do something, growth is becoming an obvious non-choice. 

Still too early but it looks like the quality of the O runs through CMC's effect on the play calling, D's main focus and being Darnold's best option on any play. Without him, that line is going to be a huge problem, just 'as is' hopefully. Darnold just needs to be more better Darnold and less practice dummy Darnold he was in NJ. That's on the line and staff at this point. Expecting Darnold to be R Wilson after what happened in NJ is ridiculously unrealistic.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...