Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is not a playoff team


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, trueblade said:

The irony is that in the preseason 9-8 or 8-9 was seen as a reasonable to optimistic view.

This is true. My post is related to the fact that most of us had adjusted our expecations after we started 3:0. 

 

I still think it's a positive season as long as we address the offensive line in the offseason and if we have enough evidence to say that Darnold is the quarterback of the future.  

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fug Drump said:

I dont believe they are being negative, they are just giving honest assessments.  The eyes don't lie.  Some of you like dwelling in the land of fairytales instead of looking hard-core reality in the face.

What? It's like a rollercoaster in here every week. It we win on Sunday the "honest assessment" will swing  to the other side faster than a Roger Federer forehand. It's not lala land to think the season is over 5 weeks in with a mediocre schedule and a winning record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Oh great. Another we suck thread. Is there anyone here who hasn't made a "I'm mad" thread? For the love of Zod, get it out of your system now. Because evidently, 87 "I'm mad" threads aren't enough.

You haven't seen anything yet, wait until the Vikings clean the Panthers clock. This place will implode.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Im expecting a loss, but sure hope i'm wrong. Certainly not in the same camp with these doom and gloomers.

I feel like Minnesota is the type of team we have been building our team to beat. Good receivers, not very mobile QB. I like this matchup this week.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BlackPanther21_ said:

Im expecting a loss, but sure hope i'm wrong. Certainly not in the same camp with these doom and gloomers.

 

Yeah, because expecting a loss is a good thing. Right? Qualifying it with a hope for success makes it all better.

 

If the doom and gloomers are the floor. And the optimism and hopers are the ceiling. You are squarely in the middle. Safe ground for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

What? It's like a rollercoaster in here every week. It we win on Sunday the "honest assessment" will swing  to the other side faster than a Roger Federer forehand. It's not lala land to think the season is over 5 weeks in with a mediocre schedule and a winning record.

I said its "la la land" if someone think their team is better than they really are.  The mirage-like 3-0 record against bad teams had a few people here in "la la land".  People who were really honest with themselves didn't take too much from a 3-0 start against bum teams, they waited to see more from the Panthers before they got too high or too low.  

When the Cowboys game came along and were the first "real" NFL team the Panthers played, they were exposed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Oh  shut the fug up. You talk out both sides of you mouth all the fugging time. You never talk football, because you spend all your time trying to rile folks up with your goofy azz takes like this one.

Nah, you shut the fug up and go sit your weak ass down somewhere.  I dont try to rile anybody up, I just speak on what every set have eyes have seen.  Just because YOUR coward ass live in an alternate reality from people with real football knowledge don't mean anybody is talking out of both sides of their mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...