Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At what point do they just have to bench Darnold?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, amcoolio said:

No, they wouldn’t. Line has given Sam plenty of time most of the day 

Yep.  Line has held today.  Excuse are running out for Brady & Sam when the line is able to hold the front.

It's becoming inexcusable how poorly this offense operates. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, saX man said:

Yep.  Line has held today.  Excuse are running out for Brady & Sam when the line is able to hold the front.

It's becoming inexcusable how poorly this offense operates. 

No sir they have not. They can't even block a simple stunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most frustrating thing is how we went "all in" on Darnold.  Having a rookie or a decent vet backing him up just in case would have been ideal.  It's too important of a position to rely solely on an unknown or previously bad player. The way we were able to get Henderson and Gilmore for so cheap, the emergence of Taylor, and DJax having a carrer year kind of looks like Horn was more of a luxury pick.  I know hindsight is 20/20 right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. And it's 100% his fault. We passed on Fields do go all in on Sam fuging Darnold. Oh wee mayne.

Lol Fields ain’t helping us win anything this year and it’s still up in the air how good he’s going to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...