Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need Cam...

sonburst4

By sonburst4,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

I don't want Cam, but not for the reason you think.

Cam doesn't deserve that. He already had to go through the likes of Byron Bell, Nate Chandler, Mike Remmers, Shula, etc. I don't want to see that man get trounced behind this line and then have to deal with a OC WORSE than Shula. Leave that man alone.

And this whole situation is why we were trying to tell fans to stop sh*tting on Cam his whole time here, because you don't know what you have until it's gone. THIS is what it looks like to be in QB purgatory for a very long time. You fans (you know who you are) got your wish.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shaqil915 Collaborator

Shaqil915

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I think it was because Cam admitted to hiding the severity of his foot injury and playing through it. He said as much in that long rambling video where he smoked a cigar and drank wine. 

Maybe, but I don't feel like that's serious enough for them to act like he never existed.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Shaqil915 said:

Maybe, but I don't feel like that's serious enough for them to act like he never existed.

When the guy got here the media was saying he wanted to clean house including Cam.

Ok, do that. Don't leak to the media your true intentions and tell Cam and the fan base a different story, when we know your office is leaking a different story.

He crushed the man's value with "I'm not a doctor" and played a coy but predictable game with a man's career.

You don't do that to a man who would run through a wall for you. It was wrong. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shaqil915 Collaborator

Shaqil915

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

When the guy got here the media was saying he wanted to clean house including Cam.

Ok, do that. Don't leak to the media your true intentions and tell Cam and the fan base a different story, when we know your office is leaking a different story.

He crushed the man's value with "I'm not a doctor" and played a coy but predictable game with a man's career.

You don't do that to a man who would run through a wall for you. It was wrong. 

Knowing how emotional Cam can be things probably got heated, but still, wonder what happened exactly to be holding this much of a grudge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Shaqil915 said:

Knowing how emotional Cam can be things probably got heated, but still, wonder what happened exactly to be holding this much of a grudge.

If someone is in your face every day saying you're good. We love you, and the media says your on the block and when you find out you are so much so you've got the "keep Cam" trucks rolling thru Charlotte streets AND they cut you at the most absolute worst time AFTER free agency AND didn't allow you to play in training camp at least to prove you could still play so maybe get a new contract OR a trade to a team that wants you because you're Cam and no longer need a doctor because I'm not a doctor. You a doctor?

He knew that man could still play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggieLean Grand Master

AggieLean

Posted
Posted

If I’m Cam, I wouldn’t bail this organization out. Front office/coaches did him dirty, and while most of the fans loved him, you had a few who didn’t appreciate him while he was here. Again, all the things they used to say of Cam are true of Darnold. 
 

Yea, if I’m Cam I don’t come back to this mess. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...