Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An ESPN analytic stat shows just how bad our offensive line really is.

SCO96

By SCO96,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

Well tbf I wouldn't say Miami's passing offense is playing well, lol.  

Sam just is the worst starting QB in the league, unfortunately, and whether we gave him the situation to be better doesn't matter. We have 2 other QBs on the roster and it's time to give them a shot because Sam, for as great as he may be off the field, is destroying morale on it.

Their passing O is leaps and bounds better than our though, and that’s really saying something. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Well tbf I wouldn't say Miami's passing offense is playing well, lol.  

Sam just is the worst starting QB in the league, unfortunately, and whether we gave him the situation to be better doesn't matter. We have 2 other QBs on the roster and it's time to give them a shot because Sam, for as great as he may be off the field, is destroying morale on it.

If you look at the bottom 5 Pass Rush Win Rate teams and the bottom 5 Adjusted Sack Rate(FO Stat) teams, you will find almost every QB in that group has outplayed Darnold by a considerable margin.

The idea that good or great QB play is impossible with shitty a OL is a myth. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

The OL is playing like they never gone to any practices and just show up on game-day. 

lamb chop - " Sup guys, sup Coach Rhule"

Rhule - "So I need you to play......lets see.....Ooo OK here it is- RG"

lamb chop - " so you want me to play RG this game??"

lamb chop - " ok....I'll do my best!! "

<Rhule turns his back>

download.jpg.5d833e6e14613e4a919a83ce6dd1a582.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If you look at the bottom 5 Pass Rush Win Rate teams and the bottom 5 Adjusted Sack Rate(FO Stat) teams, you will find almost every QB in that group has outplayed Darnold by a considerable margin.

The idea that good or great QB play is impossible with shitty a OL is a myth. 

It just takes a QB who is above literally the WORST QB in the entire NFL. That’s what we’ve got in Sam. I’m convinced now, I’ve tried to give him the benefit of the doubt, tried to give him time, but he’s just terrible. Bottom line. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The idea that good or great QB play is impossible with shitty a OL is a myth.

Truth.

A QB who has a true understanding of what QBing is can adjust.

Can they make up for their teammates faults?  Not entirely but, yeah, some.

Darnold (yeah, he's a nice guy) has to be CARRIED.

In the NFL of 2021 and forward, that is a position that dooms a franchise to failure.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If you look at the bottom 5 Pass Rush Win Rate teams and the bottom 5 Adjusted Sack Rate(FO Stat) teams, you will find almost every QB in that group has outplayed Darnold by a considerable margin.

The idea that good or great QB play is impossible with shitty a OL is a myth. 

Yeah look no further than rookie year Herbert and Burrow. Yeah Burrow got hurt, but both he and Herbert played great behind terrible offensive lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah look no further than rookie year Herbert and Burrow. Yeah Burrow got hurt, but both he and Herbert played great behind terrible offensive lines. 

Herbert, my god 1 pick away form maybe the best current QB for the now and future.....Id be talking sooooooo much poo if he was QBing for the panthers. I would not care about the lines, primo shittalking non-stop to any other team or their fans. Tho its remains to be seen if Rhule and his band of Baylor/temple bros could get out the same results.....I feel herbert would over come about any poor coaching with what Ive seen. Burrow has played great as well, given its his 2nd year and coming off a terrible knee injury. Just herbert is a alien right now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, DC Amp said:

Stop going to your fourth read, get the ball and jet that fugger out before 10 seconds and an intentional grounding foul. Know what you are doing with your preliminary read of the defense. 

I’ve never seen a QB called for more intentional grounding penalties than Sam. It’s insane. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mickeye76 Experienced

mickeye76

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Washington Football Team is 1st and 2nd respective and they have two wins.

You better find a QB.

 

Heinke been playing decent behind that line.  Washington problem may just be coaching ( looking at you Ron) and a underperforming defensive line.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, joemac said:

I’ve never seen a QB called for more intentional grounding penalties than Sam. It’s insane. 

Yup, although at least one has been a bad call (RB in the area on what I think was a screen).  Crazy how little awareness he has sometimes tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Another no sh!t metric.  Those of us that actually watch the games know both our run and pass blocking was near the bottom of the League.

I honestly don’t see how it could be any worse than what we’ve got. At that point you’re just looking at what is the biggest turd in the toilet bowl. Not a good place to be. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Well that's part of where the disconnect is then, you think Chark was a "solid NFL player" I couldn't disagree more, he's someone who had one solid NFL season and then was at best a JAG the rest of his career, I wouldn't call that a "solid NFL player" If he was a #3 WR and put up the stats he did outside of that 1 season, then sure, he's a "solid NFL player" but he put up those numbers as the #1 WR in 3 of his 4 seasons that he had meaningful roles and the #2 in a high powered offense the 4th.   That's not good and not what I'd call a "solid NFL player"
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Everything always makes sense in hindsight. Hell, I've seen guys who were touted by everyone as slam dunk "safest player in the draft" type prospects bust massively. Remember Aaron Curry? Robert Gallery? I'm just never going to say that a prospect is definitely a better NFL player than a solid NFL player. Better as a prospect? Sure, you can always make those arguments. But ultimately it comes down to what you do on Sundays and what you did on Saturdays just isn't relevant when you're talking about who's the better NFL player.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. Look at it this way, without even knowing what the rest of Chark's career turned out to be, would anyone seriously say they'd take Chark after the 2019 season over today's T-Mac if they somehow were in a draft and we were deciding between the two?  As even after that season, his potential was never what T-Mac's is right now. Even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
×
×
  • Create New...