Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam's contract and our options


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yup the draft pick/good player plus Sam trade is the only option. Realistically the only rebuilding teams with lots of cap are Dolphins and Jaguars. Broncos/Bengals/Jets have a good chunk of money but I just don't see them being interested. We also don't have a 2nd or 3rd round pick next year so I don't know if we can entice anyone to take a 2023 pick in exchange. This was one extremely expensive mistake between the picks and 5th year option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

I keep seeing some of the same questions over and over about Sam's contract next year so maybe this will help people understand our options.  I'm far from an expert so I miss something let me know but this should be correct.

Since we picked up Sam's 5th year option he is guaranteed $18.8m for the 2022 season.  If we cut him that is a $18.8 cap hit to our team next season.

People keep asking, "what if we trade him"?  Guaranteed salary is tradeable, but the question is what team would give even a conditional 7th round pick to take on Sam's $18.8m cap hit.  Answer is none.

So what our our options.

We could attach a pick with Sam hoping a team(usually a bad one) with plenty of cap space would take on the salary (happens all of the time in the NBA). 

Lets be real though, what would it take?  What would you expect if you were the offering team?  I don't see a team doing for a 3rd.  I don't see us doing it for a 1st.  My guess is it probably would take a 2nd, and even then I have my doubts.  

Next option is for us to pay part of the salary along with offering a pick.  For example Sam + 5th + us paying $10m of his salary of it for a 7th.  Here again just making up numbers to illustrate how it would work, no idea what it would take.

Another option would be to package him with a player.  Most likely a player that has a year or two left on his contract.  Maybe someone that is a free agent in 2023 that we have our doubts we can resign.  For example, Sam + Burns for a 1st and 2nd. (not saying we should, just to illustrate how it would work.)

Best and most realistic option is to keep him at least through camp next year, short of working out some combo trade or attaching picks, I don't' see any team giving you anything for him between now and then.  He is already paid for doesn't cost the team anything to keep him in camp when rosters are 90.

Maybe he looks decent next preseason and some team has an injury and is desperate for a backup and at that point maybe you get a conditional pick if you are willing to pay his salary.  Or if he turns the proverbial corner he is Cam's backup if Cam is still here.

Also quick note about June 1st cuts, I see people referencing that a lot with Sam's contract also, it does not apply.  June 1st helps when a contract has multiple years of dead money left, not a single year.

For example lets say a player has dead money cap hits of $5m (2022), $5m (2023),$5m (2024).  If you cut said player then all of his dead money would accelerate into the current year, his cap hit would be $15m. 

With June 1st designation you spread out it, and its not a 50% split like a lot think.  It allows you to take just the current years cap hit, and then the following year you take the rest.  For example said player would have cap hit of $5m in 2022 and then $10m in 2024.

Sam only has one year left on his contract, nothing to slit.

 

 

 

 

Only thing I see is to somehow sign him to an extension with the express purpose of cutting him and spreading the cap hit over a few years as dead money.  So, instead of 1 year 18 mil, they sign him to a 2 or 3 year, 18 million contract.  Sam still gets his money, but we are able to mitigate the 1 year cap hit and spread it over a few years.  Hell, I don't even know if something like that is possible.  Maybe give him another 2 or 3 million to make it worth his while?

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Only thing I see is to somehow sign him to an extension with the express purpose of cutting him and spreading the cap hit over a few years as dead money.  So, instead of 1 year 18 mil, they sign him to a 2 or 3 year, 18 million contract.  Sam still gets his money, but we are able to mitigate the 1 year cap hit and spread it over a few years.  Hell, I don't even know if something like that is possible.  Maybe give him another 2 or 3 million to make it worth his while?

Voidable years like we did when we signed Reddick.  Reddick's on a two year deal but next year is voidable.  In other words, part of his salary this year doesn't hit the cap till next year. I'd imagine Sam would have to agree to that. All sorts of accounting magic can be done.

Darnolds cap hit is as inconsequential as the FO wants it to be. Personally I'd eat the cap this year and if we are going to kick anything down the road, do so with players actually on the roster.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Voidable years like we did when we signed Reddick.  Reddick's on a two year deal but next year is voidable.  In other words, part of his salary this year doesn't hit the cap till next year. I'd imagine Sam would have to agree to that. All sorts of accounting magic can be done.

Darnolds cap hit is as inconsequential as the FO wants it to be. Personally I'd eat the cap this year and if we are going to kick anything down the road, do so with players actually on the roster.

Yeah, thats kinda what I had in mind.  Only thing though is that his agent will probably try and talk him out of something like that, considering that hes due 18 million next year if he does nothing.  But I do like the voidable years idea.  Resign him to a 3 year 20 million dollar contract with an 18 million dollar signing bonus, which can then get spread out over 3 years instead of all at once.  Am I talking out of my ass?  Is this even possible?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are going to have to attach a 2nd and Sam to get him on a bad team, that’s just reality, if after the trade that money is use on the o line or resigning our own I’m good with that instead of having Sam sit and eat up cap, I’d assume barring some mvp like resurgence resigning cam isn’t going to break the bank and will be cheaper than Sam 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah, thats kinda what I had in mind.  Only thing though is that his agent will probably try and talk him out of something like that, considering that hes due 18 million next year if he does nothing.  But I do like the voidable years idea.  Resign him to a 3 year 20 million dollar contract with an 18 million dollar signing bonus, which can then get spread out over 3 years instead of all at once.  Am I talking out of my ass?  Is this even possible?

Idk with a 5th year option situation that is already fully guaranteed.  Usually you would add years to the contract, making it $18 million for year 1 and $0 for years 2 and 3 (or any non-guaranteed money like Taysom Hill), then make some amount into bonus money which can then be spread out over the next 3 years. But with it being a 5th year option, I don't know if it can be manipulated the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah, thats kinda what I had in mind.  Only thing though is that his agent will probably try and talk him out of something like that, considering that hes due 18 million next year if he does nothing.  But I do like the voidable years idea.  Resign him to a 3 year 20 million dollar contract with an 18 million dollar signing bonus, which can then get spread out over 3 years instead of all at once.  Am I talking out of my ass?  Is this even possible?

If the Saints can pull off these stunts without penalty seems like anything is possible as long as a player agrees to it

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...