Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why not Doug Pederson?


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's proven, went to a SB, only was on the outs because of that slime ball Howie Roseman, actually was right about some things in the organization (ie the FO wanted to fire Frank Reich the year they won the superbowl but he fought that off), and I believe the players actually liked him. That last year was not on him. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You'd just have to convince Matt Rhule to hire him rather than promoting one of his own people.

Good luck with that part 😕

 

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You'd just have to convince Matt Rhule to hire him rather than promoting one of his own people.

Good luck with that part 😕

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

Go back to his history though. He turned down the Jets head coaching job because they wanted input on his staff.

Turns out they may have had valid reason.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

I think Rhule is reasonable enough to be able to look back at what didn’t and did work. Then make those changes. Unfortunately it means firing a few names

We didn't hire him to be the college version of Ron Rivera if he has to be told any of this it's time to move on.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Go back to his history though. He turned down the Jets head coaching job because they wanted input on his staff.

Turns out they may have had valid reason.

Can Tepper put the screws on him saying you no longer are allowed to promote your own buddies but are required to get proven NFL Offensive Coordinators....or else you can go back to college?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually like the idea of Pederson as an OC if we keep Rhule but fire Brady.

He's got a track record of success, runs a West Coast type system so no need for system based personnel turnover. Plus he's got a Panther connection through VP of Player Personnel Pat Stewart.

Hell, he was even on the 95 offseason roster (didn't make the team though).

If I'm Pederson, why would I be a OC when I have a good shot at being a HC next year?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Can Tepper put the screws on him saying you no longer are allowed to promote your own buddies but are required to get proven NFL Offensive Coordinators....or else you can go back to college?

Sure, but given Rhule's history I'm not sure he'd agreed to it and that could lead to a parting of the ways.

(which I'd be fine with)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...