Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staff options if Rhule stays...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup might as well show weekly Confidentials instead of actually showing the games. What's going to be really interesting to see is how many free agents bail instead re-sign here. If that happens and Tepper starts noticing a trend a la Teddy and Perryman I wonder if he'd pull the trigger before next draft

Who wants to stay and who moves on is going to be interesting.

It's still to early for deffinates but it sure feels it's all headed that way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really need to go ahead and fire Brady now. If Sean Ryan is on the short list, give him a 5 week audition and see how he does. With the bye week, it's a perfect opportunity for him to assume the new role and try to design his own offense over the next 2 weeks. I'm not super high on him right now given he's the QB coach and our QB play has been uninspiring to say the least, but I'm more than happy to give him a shot. Couldn't be much worse than what we've seen from Brady most of his tenure.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Addendum
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people have posed the question "why would these guys want to come here", and it's a valid one.

The answer in several cases would be "unemployment". 

I looked primarily at staffs that are set to be fired. Mind you, they could have other opportunities but that would depend on who gets the other head coaching jobs. New head coaches tend to prefer their own guys.

Still, the question is one reason why I left some guys off. Mike Kafka, for example, is a guy who's on the rise and is actually not under contract for next season. The question though is would he really want to go from coaching Patrick Mahomes under Andy Reid to coaching the Panthers quarterback stable under Matt Rhule.

Would you?

Throw in that if Eric Bieniemy does get a head coaching job this time around, Kafka likely gets promoted to his old job as Chiefs OC.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's most depressing about an exercise like this is looking at the differences between who we potentially could  get and who we probably would get.

Could get: Pederson, Lazor, Olson
Would probably get: Ryan or Nixon

Could get: Castillo, Munchak or Cable
Would probably get: Sparano or maybe Flaherty

Could get: Barone or Kitchens
Would probably get: Gilbride

Could get: Bisaccia
Would probably get: Foley or perhaps keep Blackburn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Icege said:

My thoughts from a previous thread regarding potential coaches being "replaced from within":

 

For my part, I agree any replacements that do wind up being made will probably come from our own staff.

That's just Rhule.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For my part, I agree any replacements that do wind up being made will probably come from our own staff.

That's just Rhule.

More or less my sentiments.

There are non-Rhule guys that have Rhule guys waiting in the wings behind them.

The QB + OC pools for next reason are leaving a lot to be desired for next season... The only OC coach that didn't make me wretch was Pederson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...