Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Currently sitting at #8 in draft order...who should we pick?

PanthersGOATFan336

By PanthersGOATFan336,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)

If we can’t get Neal… as much as it pains me to say this as a Carolina fan, the kid from State.

We spent all day talking about how our QB’s have no time to throw… Ekwonu fixes that.

If we draft this kid then we need fire Matt Rhule because it’s said that his arm length is average (no official measurements).

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

Unless we get Watson in the offseason, it’s gonna be a QB.

 

Just accept it

Fine with me so long as the rookie can sit behind Darnold. 

Tank, have all picks, go oline 2023 and rest of 2022, preserve cap and start new QB 2023 with a new coach.

Or go all oline, lame duck Rhule/Sam season, draft QB 2023.

With a little sacrifice it will work out. Keep trying to find short cuts and cheat codes trading away the future, and we stay put.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, onmyown said:

Fine with me so long as the rookie can sit behind Darnold. 

Tank, have all picks, go oline 2023 and rest of 2022, preserve cap and start new QB 2023 with a new coach.

Or go all oline, lame duck Rhule/Sam season, draft QB 2023.

With a little sacrifice it will work out. Keep trying to find short cuts and cheat codes trading away the future, and we stay put.
 

 

That’s literally worst case scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

That’s literally worst case scenario 

We aren’t there?

An oline isn’t fixed in one off-season even with a new coach, all these things take time, should’ve been addressed long ago.

What other options are there?

It’s not worst case scenario it’s how a team rebuilds day 1 scenario, but the idiot staff choice not to do the inevitable day 1 as if it doesn’t have to be done.

But it does and it will.

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)

Bottom line is the organization fugged up countless years in a row. This entire draft needs to be OL and we need to forget about being competitive next year. Build the OL up, let Darnold, Trubisky, Mariota or some other journeymen QB lead us to a top five pick, and draft your QB of the future in Stroud or Young while continuing to build up the OL with the remainder of the picks.

Picking a QB does nothing for us next year. If you truly believe a rookie QB, whether it’s Pickett, Howell, Willis, Corral, etc. would survive behind our OL then I have some beachfront property in Kansas that I want to talk to you about.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The guy could be headed to his third consecutive All-Pro team and you'd still be screaming overrated. 😂

He could be a complete bust and you will still be making excuses for him.    See how that works.   It’s funny that you think you are smarter then all the nfl insiders, scouts and teams.    Howell is just not viewed as high as you think he should be.   It’s like that dude last year who had the hard on for trask.    

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted

The sad thing is that picking a QB in this years draft would have been a solid option if this organization had any idea how to build a roster.

We had a chance to end up with both Wirfs and Slater and ended up with Brown and Horn.

Instead, our organization thought that the reason that we sucked was because of Bridgewater and gave up draft capital for Sam fugging Darnold while completely ignoring the OL position.

You can’t make this poo up.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Bottom line is the organization fugged up countless years in a row. This entire draft needs to be OL and we need to forget about being competitive next year. Build the OL up, let Darnold, Trubisky, Mariota or some other journeymen QB lead us to a top five pick, and draft your QB of the future in Stroud or Young while continuing to build up the OL with the remainder of the picks.

Picking a QB does nothing for us next year. If you truly believe a rookie QB, whether it’s Pickett, Howell, Willis, Corral, etc. would survive behind our OL then I have some beachfront property in Kansas that I want to talk to you about.

Couldn’t agree more. Will add 2023 for qb option as well, one that could start right away.

2 problems with continuing with cam (or anyone else besides sam)

He is better than anything we have but no good enough. So he may be the difference between a top pick and a #10-16 pick. Very important this does not happen.

Secondly, he or anyone else is I’ll cost more resources and sam is already paid. No need to dig further in the hole. Leave the cap and picks alone.

People don’t like this mode, though the blueprint for success, because as fans we want to win and this basically equates to throwing poo out there. But it’s a necessary process that needs to happen.

If you want to sign a FA qb in 2023 for competition or mentorship, that’s the time to do it with picks, rookie qb, cap and god willing a new coach.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...