Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Currently sitting at #8 in draft order...who should we pick?


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, RumHam said:

We need to trade up to four for a legitimate tackle. Lions don't need one. Jags will just take another qb

Nah, we should b able get LT #2 or #3 unless a team trades ahead of us.  Some stud DEs in this draft and that will eat up a couple of picks ahead of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bobcat91 said:
Get a LT like Charles Cross in the 1st. Plays in a passing offense and gave up 1 sack and 6 pressures in 500 plus passing attempts.
 
Trade into the second and get the Nevada QB, Strong.
 
Use everything else for OL 

Several of the mocks that I've seen have Cross as the best offensive lineman available at the spot where we're likely to be picking.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Take the center from Iowa…the interior of our OL is the first place to start 

And yes we need a QB, too bad we don’t have a second rounder

id Trade down if we can get a 1st and 2nd

I am 100% in on that dude but we actually will probably be picking ahead of his range. If we fug up and accidentally win another game, he is the guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

trade back 

This is the only logical option, we don't have a 2nd or 3rd, we need to trade back and acquire multiple picks. Spend money on a PROVEN tackle if available, and use the picks to supplement the interior OL where there's usually more options, unless a Tackle falls to our new pick via trade back. 

Since this is logical, we'll likely draft a LB'er. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

This is the only logical option, we don't have a 2nd or 3rd, we need to trade back and acquire multiple picks. Spend money on a PROVEN tackle if available, and use the picks to supplement the interior OL where there's usually more options, unless a Tackle falls to our new pick via trade back. 

Since this is logical, we'll likely draft a LB'er. 

Sigh.

 

Its not logical if you try and force it and not get value.  For us to trade back someone has to fall in love with a qb and then blow us away with an offer.  I just dont see it this draft.  Its top heavy with lineman and motherfuger we have to capitalize on it

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...