Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could this team beat the 2001 or 2010 teams?


KillerKat
 Share

Which is worse?  

62 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is worse?

    • 2001 Panthers
      7
    • 2010 Panthers
      22
    • 2021 Panthers
      33


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Rhule and Fitterer can’t draft. They had all those picks and not one single impact player came out of the whole thing. Got a decent RB2 and a CB2 who couldn’t stay on the field, plus a slew of XFL-caliber players. 

The 2021 draft will go down as one of the two or three worst in franchise history — basically 2011, if there was no Cam

Can't draft or can't develop? It's hard to definitively know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Depends if Matt Moore or Jimmy Clausen is starting for the 2010 team. Matt Moore would blow this team out, Jimmy would be closer but J-Stew and D-Will would run all over this team.

Before Matt got hurt that year, he was promising. Fox also started him before he was 100% which further hurt his progress. Healthy Matt Moore would kill us. He had 8 Tds and 1 int in his last 5 games in 2009. A couple of those games with 3 Tds and 0 ints against the Brett Favre lead Vikings and the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Before Matt got hurt that year, he was promising. Fox also started him before he was 100% which further hurt his progress. Healthy Matt Moore would kill us. He had 8 Tds and 1 int in his last 5 games in 2009. A couple of those games with 3 Tds and 0 ints against the Brett Favre lead Vikings and the Giants.

Yeah if Matt hadn’t gotten hurt we were probably a 5-7 win team. He played great against SF and then went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of revisionist history with just how bad Jimmy Clausen was.. 3 TDs in 13 games. And our defense? 28th in points allowed. 

That defense couldn't stop this years team. Nick Hayden, Tyler Brayton, Dan Connor, Richard Marshall, Charles Godfrey and Sherrod Martin are far and away inferior to our team now.

Matt Moore, Stewart and Smitty may cook our present defense tho.

And Fox>>>>Rhule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Lot of revisionist history with just how bad Jimmy Clausen was.. 3 TDs in 13 games. And our defense? 28th in points allowed. 

That defense couldn't stop this years team. Nick Hayden, Tyler Brayton, Dan Connor, Richard Marshall, Charles Godfrey and Sherrod Martin are far and away inferior to our team now.

Matt Moore, Stewart and Smitty may cook our present defense tho.

And Fox>>>>Rhule

You did selectively take away the defenders that were far, far better than our current ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...