Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reddit user says he has an “uncle that works for the team” and Rhule will be fired

FuFuLamePoo

By FuFuLamePoo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

Everybody in the huddle is about to be forming LLCs

I’ll call mine “Lil’ Process LLC” and expect my money to grow a 1,000% even if no one can see it. I figure it’ll take me 7 years to achieve those returns because that’s how long it took Jay-Z to be an overnight success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted

@Mr. Scot my earlier "believe" question was driven by my belief that "time with family and friends" absolutely was not the driver of Luke's departure from the scouting/staff functions he had...

...but rather, an early indication of dysfunction inside Rhule's organization. (as pointed out at the time)

Cannot remember the name of the other guy/coach who had been with Rhule for 10+ years and departed with no legit explanation but do seem to remember some "internal friction" speculation that seems analogous to some of the info presented about Rhule in the reddit thread...

...point being, were Luke and un-named Coach actually canary's in the coal mine and signalling some serious dysfunction internally?

Post-Script:  As per the other now-locked thread, that Luke would (a) watch camp from outside the hedges and (b) watch a game from the cheap seats in the stands sends a clear signal that he's either (c) not welcome, or (d) has z-e-r-o interest in being associated with the current administration.

Your thoughts?

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

The thread was locked cuz you bumped a 5 month old thread like a moron 

So what?

Is there a hard deadline on "bumping threads"?  If so, what is it?

Are you stalking me?  Seems odd you'd reply in under 10 seconds...

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CBDellinger Experienced

CBDellinger

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

@Mr. Scot my earlier "believe" question was driven by my belief that "time with family and friends" absolutely was not the driver of Luke's departure from the scouting/staff functions he had...

...but rather, an early indication of dysfunction inside Rhule's organization. (as pointed out at the time)

Cannot remember the name of the other guy/coach who had been with Rhule for 10+ years and departed with no legit explanation but do seem to remember some "internal friction" speculation that seems analogous to some of the info presented about Rhule in the reddit thread...

...point being, were Luke and un-named Coach actually canary's in the coal mine and signalling some serious dysfunction internally?

Post-Script:  As per the other now-locked thread, that Luke would (a) watch camp from outside the hedges and (b) watch a game from the cheap seats in the stands sends a clear signal that he's either (c) not welcome, or (d) has z-e-r-o interest in being associated with the current administration.

Your thoughts?

Would you stick around for a total rebuild after the team switched to a 3-4 scheme (per the owners request) that doesn’t favor your skill set all the while having major concussion concerns???   Not to mention having enough Ms in the bank to live comfortably for damn ever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Would you stick around for a total rebuild after the team switched to a 3-4 scheme (per the owners request) that doesn’t favor your skill set all the while having major concussion concerns???   Not to mention having enough Ms in the bank to live comfortably for damn ever. 

Yeah I think Kuechly was just ready to go. It was the end of an era, new system, new coach, plus his concussion history. We really don’t know how severe his were.

I’m pretty sure Dan Morgan used to concuss himself by just brushing his hair towards the end.

Edited by Cdparr7
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Mentor

SOJA

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 12/28/2021 at 11:14 AM, chknwing said:

makes no sense to wait to the end of the year when you could be interviewing canidates now.  if he was going to be fired he would have been already.

My counterargument to this is: Tepper fired Rivera midseason last time. He REALLY doesn't want to become the Browns. We wants to become the Steelers. Steelers a.) rarely fire and hire new coaches and B.) he doesn't want a reputation of a middling team that fires it's coach mid year 

 

also think about it, bears, vikings , raiders and maybe the giants are all going to fire their coaches. they haven't yet, why not? 

Jags only fired urban bc they had to 

Edited by SOJA
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, SOJA said:

also think about it, bears, vikings , raiders and maybe the giants are all going to fire their coaches. they haven't yet, why not? 

Yeah this whole “new black Monday” thing turned out to be a flop. My guess is that teams are still gonna hold onto the same timeline as year prior with coaching hires.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted
Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

Yeah this whole “new black Monday” thing turned out to be a flop. My guess is that teams are still gonna hold onto the same timeline as year prior with coaching hires.

They are all just waiting on the first one to fall (other than Meyer everyone seen that coming)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...