Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule says Darnold will start Sunday


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

So, when Darnold fumbles or throws an INT when it involves the OL running into him, will he bench Darnold like he did Cam?

Nah. I think he'll let Darnold turn the ball over multiple times and still keep him in the game. He is just hoping Darnold can have a good game and carry a win with a sieve of a defense just one time so Rhule can hang his hat on that poo.

Kyle Allen proved to be better than Sam Darnold. Cam Newton has proven to be better than Sam Darnold.

The reality will be Rhule riding Sam and PJ into the ground with all their poo play. He does not want Cam to look better than either of his QBs while coming off the couch and working with a limited playbook.

I believe we all agree Sam has lost his starting job weeks ago.

Rhule has ended the careers of several players over the past 2 seasons. Bridgewater knew he needed the coaches to shape up or he had to run as fast as he could to have any shot at prolonging his NFL career.

Edited by CPantherKing
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stbugs said:

3-4 years? Maybe as a short yardage/pre-2021 Taysom Hill, but he’s not going to be a starting QB again. I’m not sure if you’ve been watching but Cam has looked really bad. It wasn’t incorrect when posted in the game thread that as bad as Sam is, he looked better throwing the ball than Cam last week.

Also, we aren’t winning the NFCS any time soon. We’ve got too many holes, including QB, and we don’t have enough picks to fill them with good enough players.

I’m not sure if you’ve been watching but the team has been putrid, there’s not a qb in the nfl that would have had a winning record with what we’ve collectively put on the field the last 5 weeks. 

half these post there’s zero context, I mean the guy played a game without a fg unit, in which if we had said fg unit we might have actually won 
 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, rippadonn said:

I love Jake too but to even whisper that Jake was a better player is blasphemy.

Cam is a better player than 2003 Jake and looks to have 3-4yrs if he plays his game correctly as he has. 

That being the case why not reload the offensive line, play QB1, go back to 4-3 base, put Chinn at LB, draft somebody to play besides D Brown, make Phil Snow interim, hire Rod Chudzinsky as assistant head coach (cheap/inhouse solution) and let's go after the NFCS. 

Current Cam better than 2003 Jake? Nah

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Oh Peppers is an underachieving guy as well 

 

He should of made us forget Deacon Jones and Bruce Smith were ever born.

But he didn't have the drive for that.

Peppers is top 5 all time in sacks, forced fumbles and INTs by a DE in NFL history.  If it was a tracked stat then you probably could add FG blocks too.  

hard to call him underachieving.   He simply had the same demeanor that DJ Moore has.  And people see that and claim that must mean less effort than a guy that shows emotion.  

Peppers is our hall of fame lock by a large margin 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Peppers is top 5 all time in sacks, forced fumbles and INTs by a DE in NFL history.  If it was a tracked stat then you probably could add FG blocks too.  

hard to call him underachieving.   He simply had the same demeanor that DJ Moore has.  And people see that and claim that must mean less effort than a guy that shows emotion.  

Peppers is our hall of fame lock by a large margin 

 

I know he's top 5. But he had the physical gifts to be the GOAT by a large margin.

That's underachieving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, X-Clown said:

It’s so stupid because Jake himself would admit that Cam was a far better QB than him. But some guys like Catsfan see a lot of their self in the plucky aw shucks underdog without as much natural talent and can’t identify with the confident strong guy who goes against their stereotypes of what a QB “should be”. You can tell where they are going as soon as they start throwing out win/loss records as an individual stat but somehow discounting being MVP of the entire league.

Almost guaranteed this guy would have been more comfortable with Derek Anderson than Cam in his prime. You will continue to see this when potential QBs are discussed this off season, they don’t want any QB who isn’t a pocket statue because they’re “less accurate” and “can’t read a defense” and will immediately compare every QB that fits that mold to Brady even though he is the exception rather than the rule in this day and age.

Absolutely spot tf on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I know he's top 5. But he had the physical gifts to be the GOAT by a large margin.

That's underachieving. 

Peppers statiscally might be the GOAT by a fair margin as is....if you look at the position from a well rounded aspect.   Because he is top 5 in basically everything.   The others aren't. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...