Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could it get worse?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Watson is set to make 35M next year. Won’t be any FA signings if they trade for him. They would have to restructure many guys just to fill out the roster with 1-2M players. 

We’d have to send Darnold to Hou as part of the deal to clear cap.  He wouldn’t add value, would simply be a cap clearing move.

we could also restructure Shaq and convert CMCs salary to a signing bonus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

We’d have to send Darnold to Hou as part of the deal to clear cap.  He wouldn’t add value, would simply be a cap clearing move.

we could also restructure Shaq and convert CMCs salary to a signing bonus 

 You would have to send HOU at least a 2nd round pick(maybe more) just to take him. Along with whatever it takes to get Watson.(3 1sts and ???) And they have already kicked both those guys guaranteed money down the road which is why CMC is already almost impossible to trade. Trading for Watson is about as foolish as keeping Rhule for another year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Watson is cleared legally, I don't have a problem trading for him.  And I expect the cost to get him will be significantly lower than what has been reported thus far...

What I do have a problem with is trading for Watson if Rhule is still coaching here.  Trading for anyone while Rhule is coach will be a complete waste of assets and resources. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

As long as Watson is cleared legally, I don't have a problem trading for him.  And I expect the cost to get him will be significantly lower than what has been reported thus far...

What I do have a problem with is trading for Watson if Rhule is still coaching here.  Trading for anyone while Rhule is coach will be a complete waste of assets and resources. 

We’ve all had a time in our lives where the right decision was obvious to the world and yet still we gave the finger to wisdom and took the pooch to brown town.

Smart?  Hardly.

How poo really goes?  Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

We’ve all had a time in our lives where the right decision was obvious to the world and yet still we gave the finger to wisdom and took the pooch to brown town.

Smart?  Hardly.

How poo really goes?  Yep.

Valid.

Never affected thousands of fans and a billion dollar business when I screwed up, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...