Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold: 0 TDs in 20 consecutive quarters now.


Shaqil915
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Cant we all just agree that we don't have the qb of the future on the roster?

 

I agree 100%. But at least with Cam you get a little more than 

Sam sacked for three yards

Sam sacked for 10 yards 

Sam throws short over the middle incomplete

Sam throws interception 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

I agree 100%. But at least with Cam you get a little more than 

Sam sacked for three yards

Sam sacked for 10 yards 

Sam throws short over the middle incomplete

Sam throws interception 

yeah, cam never throws ints or takes a sack for a loss. lol.  

Edited by Paa Langfart
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam got a raw deal here.   Looked great w two TD's in the Arizona game.   Looked really good in the Washington game where the Defense looked like a wall of water.  Looked bad in the game against Miami.  Cam didn't look awful in the Falcons game and if he had been allowed to finish may have won the game.  Cam also didn't look awful in the Bills game.  Cam didn't get a chance to finish the Bucs game and didn't have enough to go on to say bad or not.   He had one week to learn the play book.  He didn't have the support of his coach.  He barely had the support of this fan base. And yet he still looked way better than Darnold.  Is he MVP caliber Cam?  No.  Is he leagues better than Darnold?  Yes!  Does he deserve to stay and at least be a back up QB here!  Yes!  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam is better and cheaper and we didn’t have to trade draft capital for him.

this is as simple as it gets, if we weren’t on the hook for 19 mil to Sam next year while also not giving up picks I guarantee posters wouldn’t be coming down as hard on him 

qb of the future may not be on the roster but you can’t judge based off the collective group we field this season, and there’s no need to waste next years season just because darnold is getting paid, this ain’t high school ball, you put your best 11 on the field

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...