Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule set to appear on WFNZ Thursday morning


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

on rashawn slater "not ideal size for a tackle"

 

fug you rhule, fug you you fuging moron

He's a god damn retard lol fug him

Literally the dumbest HC we've ever had and may easily be the worst in league history. 

 

RhuleClown2.jpeg

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

For him to make those remarks about Slater after we fielded some of the worst OL lineups in history is simply unforgivable.

And given Slater's performance. It's one thing to think that in the pre-draft process. Scouts miss on evaluations all the time. But to say it after you have 17 games of NFL tape with Slater playing well at LT? Yeah, not good.

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

That’s fine. Horn is going to be a great player and a foundational piece to our defense.

That said, we didn’t miss him at all and witnessed first hand how quickly you can replace/mask that piston.

Slater would have been the better pick.

Yeah, if Horn had played this season and had 4 picks and made the pro bowl, nobody would be questioning the pick-we were terrible at CB last year-short memories.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Zod said:

I am less confident in Rhule than I was yesterday.

That's because he fugin confirmed he can't evaluate talent for poo...usually people don't admit it like that lol...he's even dumber than we thought and we thought he was about as dumb as it gets.

Science needs to take a look at how he can breathe unassisted.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Ron Rivera said multiple times during his tenure that when was with MH, he told MH what he wanted, and dealt with what MH got him. Not all GM/HC relationships and processes are created equal. There really is no "blueprint" for success. Even if you look at the top 4 teams in the league, they all operate their FOs differently.

True. I just don’t think Rhule was the type of guy to take that approach with. Tepper seems to prefer a one-man show over a dynamic duo so hopefully post-Rhule we find someone that can operate in this capacity more effectively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

What is his obsession with "ideal size"?

I have no idea. When Tony Dungy turned around the Bucs he used to look for the smaller guys because they typically had more fight in them and had to be more technically sound to get this far. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Can someone just ask with the line performing so poorly all year, why did it take him until the last few weeks of the season to put BC at his college position of Tackle? Why did he wait for the last game of the year to put in brown?

What is his obsession with "ideal size"?

With his comments about Slater's size and BC's arms, seems he is trying to fill ideal molds rather than put the best player in the position that they can play.  Wonder if he suffered from Napoleon complex as a player and is not fixated on measurables. He needs to drop the tape measure and pick up the game tape.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zod said:

I have no idea. When Tony Dungy turned around the Bucs he used to look for the smaller guys because they typically had more fight in them and had to be more technically sound to get this far. 

It would be one thing if Brady was some alarmingly T. rex of a man but he really isn’t that much smaller than Gross as you and others have pointed out. 

And some of the best LTs (Jason Peters immediately comes to mind) we’re undersized arm length wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...