Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kirk Cousins Trade Potential?


AndrewLaskoski
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

So Rhule can trade away what he wants for Cousins. No worries. 

My conspiracy theory is that tepper has cut rhule off at the nuts and will not allow any more crazy ass trades or signings.  The only move thats been made thats been successful was Reddick (only a 1 year deal) and maybe Jones.  Other than that its been pretty much poo. 

My gut says there is no way Tepper actually thinks rhule is going to turn this around.  He traded a 2022 second and paid Darnold so thats on you rhule go make it work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's no way the Steelers are dumb enough to trade for Kirk Cousins. The Broncos? Maybe. The Panthers? Definitely.

Imagine getting suckered into terrible QB trades in back to back offseasons by the NY Jets and the Detroit Lions. I mean if we're in a race to establish ourselves as hands down the worst organization in the NFL, that's how you'd do it

 

 

Cousins is a Viking, not a Lion. You might have been thinking of Jared Goff.

Cousins had a fantastic system around him in Minnesota, I don’t see that translating here where he could put up those kind of numbers. Seems like he be a better fit on a team like the colts, Steelers, or broncos that has a ready made situation for a QB at his career stage.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Newbie said:

We’re totally doing this. My guess is we’ll put together a package similar to what we offered for Stafford. Rhule will get this done at any cost to save his job. Our worst case scenario is about to play out. 

Well, that’s why you fire Matt Rhule then.  Because Cousins isn’t Matt Stafford.  Cousins is a slightly better Teddy Bridgewater. 
 

and we are suppose to be “rebuilding” our offense.  Trading away Stafford type comp for a bland and old Cousins isn’t how you build. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Never understood the hate Cousins gets. Hes pretty much Tony Romo and would easily be the 2nd best QB weve ever had. If we can get a favorable trade and draft OL in the first suddenly we would have some hope again

Cousins and Romo have completely different play styles and mentalities. 

Romo was basically a gunslinger and Cousins has been battling his risk adverse tendencies his entire career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

33 is QB prime these days in the NFL. Winning in the NFL is not due to a single person. He took the WFT and the vikings to the playoffs. Both were middle of the road teams with middle of the road coaching staffs....

Again, I said I would take him on the cheap.

Middle of the road teams…

The Vikings were 11-5 before Cousins arrived and the redskins also were in the playoffs with RG3.

You posting stats without context. Signing Cousins will lead us further into purgatory picking in the middle of the draft like the Vikings have the majority of his tenure. Cousins the master of lightning up bad teams at 1 pm and sh*tying the bed vs a good team in prime time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Cousins and Romo have completely different play styles and mentalities. 

Romo was basically a gunslinger and Cousins has been battling his risk adverse tendencies his entire career. 

Romo attempted only 100 more passes in his career than Kirk has so far
 

Romo career 65% completion

Kirk career 66% completion

Romo 7.9 career YPA

Kirk 7.7 career YPA

Romo 248 TDs/117 INT

Kirk 223 TDs/91 INT

Romo 97 career QB rating

Kirk 98 career QB rating

 

You can talk mentalities and play styles but production is virtually identical and in fact it would be hard to find 2 QBs with such similar production to each other. Both pretty damn good QBs that for whatever reason got all the blame for the teams misfortunes

Edited by KillaCamNewton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Cousins is a Viking, not a Lion. You might have been thinking of Jared Goff.

Cousins had a fantastic system around him in Minnesota, I don’t see that translating here where he could put up those kind of numbers. Seems like he be a better fit on a team like the colts, Steelers, or broncos that has a ready made situation for a QB at his career stage.0

Yep, I was thinking about Goff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I actually love the transfer portal and the NIL deals.  It makes it more exciting.  And I completely agree about the TV deals tied to the conferences is the real issue.  Even you bringing up Maryland is a great example.  They were a founding member of the ACC, and while not great at football in my lifetime, they were a huge part of the basketball fabric of the ACC.  I was pissed when they left for that reason alone…  and now in the ACC we have teams like Cal and Stanford which is clearly not the Atlantic Coast, all while teams like Clemson, FSU, and UNC are trying to get out.  I really, really hate that poo.
    • Teams like Cal and Stanford in the ACC is just dumb and it honestly shows how desperate they were. It's documented that west coast teams win less than expected when traveling to the east coast to play and now you're joining a conference where practically every away game puts you in that scenario.
    • Damn.  I stand corrected.  I wasn’t aware of Maryland’s national championship.  I was stating it more so just off brand and off the top of my head, tradition and prestige, namely the amount of notable pros they have turned out.  That was probably a dumb criteria to base it off of, but I just think that translates to competitiveness, and I never looked at Maryland as competitive in football in my lifetime.  I thought their move to the Big Ten was particularly stupid because when they left the ACC they weren’t even really competitive then.  So I feel like in terms of modern prestige, UNC is more relevant?  So I think they would have more appeal to potential suitors if they wanted to move conferences. And as far as the conferences go, I could be way wrong here, but my prediction is, the SECs and Big 10s of the world are going to shoot themselves in the foot if they’re not careful.  Yes, they are the big boys now, but if they’re continue to turn away viable candidates to join, like Clemson and FSU (and not homer talk, but UNC as well if they actually spent their money wisely), I predict they power is going to shift elsewhere, because the NIL money evens the playing field.  Look at Alabama now.  That’s why Saban left when he did…  he knew how to game the system as it was.  Were the players getting paid then?  Absolutely, but once it became legal to pay them at any school, who tf wants to go to Alabama?  If I’m not from there and I want to stay in-state, now an in-state school can pay me.  If I am from there and I have to choose between fuging Alabama and somewhere else that will pay me the same, why stay there?  Because just on its own merits, what is the appeal to Alabama?  But this example goes for anything.  Even a kid in Georgia.  Yeah, Georgia is more prestigious and a powerhouse, but what if Georgia Tech, or even Tennessee or Florida pays me more?  I just think the NIL has made it way different.  You don’t have to all funnel to Alabama or Georgia to be relevant anymore because anywhere can become a powerhouse school overnight, if done correctly.  So if the SEC and Big 10 keep acting all highsididdy on everybody, I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of those other teams that comprise the rest of the top 25-50 programs band together to form one other super conference that starts siphoning players away from them.
×
×
  • Create New...