Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina to active in veteran QB market...


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

We better not be trading for most of these guys unless we are GETTING something for doing so.  QBs like Kirk Cousins are a liability because of their salary, and their availability is a testament to that.  Why aren't the Vikings content with this QB?  Why did SF trade 3 1st round picks to draft a QB?

The truth is, these QBs aren't good enough and there is no reason to waste resources on acquiring them.  We should acquire a cheap veteran if we need to bring in someone else at QB.  Either that, or do what every other normal front office does and draft a guy.

wow buddy keep these hot takes outta here, you clearly just don’t see the value in showing every other franchise how smart you are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philly has enough draft capital to make some noise--if they are not happy with Jalen Hurts, they could be the first domino to fall.   Imagine trading away 2 firsts this year for a top QB...Then Hurts and Minshew become available.   Just spitballing-nobody knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Philly has enough draft capital to make some noise--if they are not happy with Jalen Hurts, they could be the first domino to fall.   Imagine trading away 2 firsts this year for a top QB...Then Hurts and Minshew become available.   Just spitballing-nobody knows.

so they don’t want those guys but they want the guy we can get so we give up the guy they want to get the guys they don’t want

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

I vote for Trubisky at 5 years/25 mil. $5 mil would put him in top 10 of backup QBs. We would lock up a strong backup who has potential to be a mid tier starter. 

Ohhhhh nooooooo!! Nobody should be getting a multi year contract.. Nobody in this FA class..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Coker has earned his spot---truly earned it.  I still believe that we need to add a more dynamic speedster with high upside to the mix. Then we can really soar, provided we get upgraded QB play...
    • Coker has certainly earned it. Good for him.
    • I don't think we don't call things aggressively, for a Canales offense, anyway. We don't have a QB who makes aggressive throws nor stresses defenses downfield. He is at a career low on 20+ attempts per game and his career 10-20 QB rating is abysmal.  That will always be a limiting factor IF you are looking for a high flying, downfield offense. I am not even that concerned about it, I just want to see effective offense and we decidedly do not possess that. A large chunk of that is Bryce. I think the second biggest chunk is Canales. All the other components(XL included) are fairly minor in comparison to those two things. I am an advocate of attempting to improve at QB. I am not focused on finding "The QB." We failed at that with Bryce. So let's just get better. If that's a one year vet or a draftee or a cheap trade or some combination of any/all, we should do that. We have to get that QB better. Bryce will fail in 2026 and we need to have REALISTIC options to take over when that happens. That ain't Andy Dalton or Hendon Hooker or Jack Plummer or Mike White or....you get the picture. Be serious about hedging that Bryce bet and not just having to make do if he struggles or gets injured.  My mind is definitely made up on Canales. It's year two and he hasn't improved much, nor do I think the bones of a good HC are there. Ron Rivera got to that point after two seasons and he was open about the changes he had to make and advice he got to make that leap in year 3. If we don't see the same after next year, how is he not just Brian Daboll?
×
×
  • Create New...