Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2022 QB draft Class..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Look thru the video objectively.. And Yes I know all are just highlights and not all 22's.. But under these criteria who would you truly feel you can build a franchise around??

1. Arm talent- making NFL throws ..

2. Running a pro style offense- coming in with a better perception of NFL offenses..

3. Athleticism- ability to work a pocket scramble and make off scripted plays... Run RPO's and add another level to the offense..

4. Ability to make NFL reads and pre snap adjustments..

5. Who can get into a shootout and hold his own...

Now the intangibles (leadership, speed, measurements, work ethic) we won't know until later in the draft prospects if at all..

I'll put all best season..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Only put QB ranked to go in top 4 rounds...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these guys seem to stare down their #1 option, but Highlights are generally plays were you get that read and its successful. I have always thought Pickett seemed the most NFL ready. Besides him I like Zappe in the later rounds. Ridder to me is the most interesting as far as upside. He seems to run away from people. Willis while a good athlete, doesn't seem to do that to people even playing against Liberty's schedule, so his athleticism may not be as NFL ready as some of the others. Strong has great deep ball but i've seen too many games where his decision-making and intermediate game haven't been on point. Matt Corral to me seems to be a kid who has all the ability, and can sometimes make great decisions, but not with any real consistency. Corral did make plays against SEC defenses, however, which to me is something to be considered. Howell is tough for me to analyze because I'm a homer. He has obvious talent but too many times I've watched him fail to make meaningful plays when games were on the line. I like him and his talent but that worries me. The other kid from Iowa St. I literally know nothing about and so can't accurately judge him besides to say his highlights were great (like all of the other kids highlights).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corral has the best arm talent. Strong and Willis might have a slightly stronger arm but they can’t make the throws at the angles or on the run Corral can. I also Corral has the best natural throwing motion with the quickest release.

 

None of these guys run a pro style offense.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Michael G said:

All of these guys seem to stare down their #1 option, but Highlights are generally plays were you get that read and its successful. I have always thought Pickett seemed the most NFL ready. Besides him I like Zappe in the later rounds. Ridder to me is the most interesting as far as upside. He seems to run away from people. Willis while a good athlete, doesn't seem to do that to people even playing against Liberty's schedule, so his athleticism may not be as NFL ready as some of the others. Strong has great deep ball but i've seen too many games where his decision-making and intermediate game haven't been on point. Matt Corral to me seems to be a kid who has all the ability, and can sometimes make great decisions, but not with any real consistency. Corral did make plays against SEC defenses, however, which to me is something to be considered. Howell is tough for me to analyze because I'm a homer. He has obvious talent but too many times I've watched him fail to make meaningful plays when games were on the line. I like him and his talent but that worries me. The other kid from Iowa St. I literally know nothing about and so can't accurately judge him besides to say his highlights were great (like all of the other kids highlights).

 

Jmo..

Best Combo of physical talent, college production and upside.. is Howell and Willis..

Best Arms .. Wills and Strong 

NFL ready .. Corral and Pickett

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ivan The Awesome said:

Which is a step up from Darnold and any other QB we've had in the last 4 years... So that's not really a negative. 

Yeah but there are level above Sam Darnold and avg. NFL starters.. And those are the ones you draft in the top 10 and build around..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yeah but there are level above Sam Darnold and avg. NFL starters.. And those are the ones you draft in the top 10 and build around..

Sucks to be in a lame duck situation because if he does pick a QB and they suck ass and gets fired, next HC doesn't have an obligation to keep him. Meaning they have wasted ANOTHER pick on a QB. This is why I wanted Rhule gone already, he's delaying the inevitable. It's a catch 22. 

Edited by Ivan The Awesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Howell’s deep ball is getting overlooked. The man can launch it down field pretty well. Unfortunately our line won’t allow him to do so… It all depends on where they go. The Broncos have a decent team set up for quick success depending on who they hire as coach. The one I think could do the best with our team/coach is probably Howell. Willis needs a year (like the Niners did with Lance), Strong needs a pocket, and Corral would get hurt. Howell has had success with a shifty OL and not good coaching. I’m not a UNC guy (Auburn fan), but I think Howell might be the best fit with what we have. If we had to draft one, a trade down and snagging Howell in the middle of the 1st would be the best case IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...