Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This explains a lot (Bills-Chiefs)


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

A good old screw-up in communications explains what has been bothering me since it happened.

That said, the clock doesn't start until somebody touches it after it has been kicked.  The Chiefs were probably told to down it as soon as they touched it, so he would have still had 13 seconds.  Now where that would have been is another question.  It almost always happens inside the 25, so it would have at least added a few more yards to the equation.

But, you never know if whoever gathers it in (assuming it was a Chief) disregards what has been drilled into him and starts running with it, starting the clock.

Seems like calling a squib kick and not making sure the kicker got the message is about like calling an end around and not tell the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly tired of hearing about the kickoff. A squib kick isn't the answer either as it leaves the possibility that it is jumped on and downed in better field position than the 25 if the touch back. Clock wouldn't start in that situation either. You kick a high kick to about the 10 yard line and force a fair catch there, or the clock starts on the run back. 

The Bills messed up that situation, but the Chiefs had several blunders that almost cost them the game. If the Chiefs kicker doesn't miss on 4 points, the Chiefs don't need the 13 second drive. If the Chiefs don't run Mahomes out wide and run a stupid backup TE speed option play on 3rd and 1 inside the 20, they most likely convert and go on to score 7 instead of 3, another 4 points left on the field. Bills defense was gased at that point.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

Honestly tired of hearing about the kickoff. A squib kick isn't the answer either as it leaves the possibility that it is jumped on and downed in better field position than the 25 if the touch back. Clock wouldn't start in that situation either. You kick a high kick to about the 10 yard line and force a fair catch there, or the clock starts on the run back. 

The Bills messed up that situation, but the Chiefs had several blunders that almost cost them the game. If the Chiefs kicker doesn't miss on 4 points, the Chiefs don't need the 13 second drive. If the Chiefs don't run Mahomes out wide and run a stupid backup TE speed option play on 3rd and 1 inside the 20, they most likely convert and go on to score 7 instead of 3, another 4 points left on the field. Bills defense was gased at that point.

I've always been a believer that one play does not cost a team a game.  You can always look at the game and find a string of "missed opportunities," mistakes, and points left on the field by both teams.  Then there are coaching mistakes or being a little to clever and outsmarting themselves.

The biggest factor in the tying semi-drive was that KC had all their time outs.  That is extremely rare in those types of situations.  The odd thing was the Bills acted like they were defending the sidelines on the last two plays leading to the FG when the sidelines didn't matter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I've always been a believer that one play does not cost a team a game.  You can always look at the game and find a string of "missed opportunities," mistakes, and points left on the field by both teams.  Then there are coaching mistakes or being a little to clever and outsmarting themselves.

The biggest factor in the tying semi-drive was that KC had all their time outs.  That is extremely rare in those types of situations.  The odd thing was the Bills acted like they were defending the sidelines on the last two plays leading to the FG when the sidelines didn't matter.

Exactly!  And yes the Bills were defending sidelines, left the middle wide open 2nd level, you just don't do that when they have 3 timeouts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I've always been a believer that one play does not cost a team a game.  You can always look at the game and find a string of "missed opportunities," mistakes, and points left on the field by both teams.  Then there are coaching mistakes or being a little to clever and outsmarting themselves.

I agree with that, though there's also the theory that games are won not always by the better team, but more frequently by the team that makes me fewest mistakes.

There are arguments to be made for the validity of that idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're a professional kicker and don't get the call, why would you not run to the sideline?

I can't imagine delay of game on a kickoff is more than just backing up 5 yards; however to be fair I don't know the exact rule for that. 

There's too many people on the staff not to be able to address that in some form or another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can't keep pining for what never happened....but for god sakes, DeJean, Frazier... and we got this dude in a R1 trade up.  The most notable blunder of this era, that's for sure. 
    • Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
×
×
  • Create New...