Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on the Panthers quarterback options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I think they’ll either try to get a mid tier vet FA QB or stick with Darnold. I don’t see them drafting Pickett. If they passed on Fields and Jones, why would they pick Pickett? He’s a lesser prospect than either of those guys. 

Because Rhule knows him. He recruited him to Temple.

Also Fitterer seemed effusive when asked about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Because Rhule knows him. He recruited him to Temple.

Also Fitterer seemed effusive when asked about him.

Well Rhule also sounded effusive about Cam before he cut him. I don’t count on these guys doing anything like you’d expect. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Dory said:

Cam '20 - 21 TD, 15 Games

Carr '21 - 23 TD, 17 Games

Ok, bud

He had 8 passing touchdowns in 15 games that year. He hasn't had 20 or more passing touchdowns since 2018. I hate it too but that's reality. You need to find someone to talk to and move on from all that fella.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dory said:

Cam '20 - 21 TD, 15 Games

Carr '21 - 23 TD, 17 Games

Ok, bud

Except you're being dishonest. Carr's stats are his passing TDs while your cherry-picked Newton stats are total TDs. Newton only threw for 8 TDs in 20. He threw for 4 in 21. Carr threw for 27 in 20 and 23 in 21. Therefore, Carr > Newton as a passer at this stage of their careers and that's ok. The brightest bulbs usually burn out the quickest and Cam was used as a Swiss army knife by Ron and Co as a Panther.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...