Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Darnold Decision


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I saw it before. I'll say it again. 

That scouting room is filled with YES men and desperation. They all show doubt in their voices, body language, and rhetoric. They talked themselves into the Darnold acquisition.

No one is filling the role of devils advocate. A championship roster is built on knowing what you don't want, and not by piling up all the potential positives. Anyone who can be drafted or compete for a roster spot has potential.

Not one of them mentioned leadership, competitive nature, or game winning ability at the NFL level.

Fire everyone in that room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Where is Darnold? 

Does he spend the off-season in Charlotte working out at team facilities?

He's meditating on the beach in California. He has no drive to be the best of the best. Anyone who did their research on Darnold would have known his goals do not align with a championship organization.

Darnold is looking forward to being a family man and coaching kids in football camps. If anyone thinks taking a 20 year old QB in the draft who has never visualized themselves playing in the league for 20 years is making a huge mistake.

You're better off with an ultra competitive 25 year old who is going to give their everything for 10 years.

Edited by CPantherKing
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

They talked themselves into it. First off, they believed they were better coaches than they are. That led them to believe they could unlock Sam's talent. 

If they succeeded Rhule would have his guy, who he fixed, and wouldn't upset his preferred Rhule centric power structure.

But to be fair, Huddlers convinced themselves of it too. A lot of talk was made about how Tannehil became a better QB, how horrible Gase was, Sam being a better passer than Cam and Teddy, he would be good with the quick short reads and would play well if the pocket broke down because he throws well outside the pocket and anyone who said otherwise was a Cam nut hugger.

Hilarious looking back.

Darnold was a panic move.  They burned the bridge with Teddy publicly (to the applause within the Huddle), swung and missed at a couple of veterans who wanted to win now, and apparently only liked Lawrence and Wilson in the draft class both of whom were going to be long gone by the time the #8 pick came around.    That left very few options.

Tannehill did become better as time went on, and Gase was horrible.  That does not mean Darnold can follow what Tannehill did, and Gase being horrible may have only added to Darnold's deficiencies, not been the root of all of them.  Our coaching staff liked what they saw of his raw talent and had some misguided belief that they were good enough to resurrect him.

The real problem was entering into a pi$$ing contest with Teddy publicly rather than just sticking to the original plan.  The Huddle would have rioted had Teddy been the starter last year, but the Huddle riots over a lot of things.  The Huddle would have turned into Chernobyl had the drafted Jones, too, despite some saying we could have drafted him if we didn't like Fields.

The second problem was thinking we were only a QB away from being a "playah."  OL is also on the list of our worst problems, but that and QB are not our only problems.

The third problem was exercising the 5th year option on Darnold.  This one compounds the other two.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Darnold was a panic move.  They burned the bridge with Teddy publicly (to the applause within the Huddle), swung and missed at a couple of veterans who wanted to win now, and apparently only liked Lawrence and Wilson in the draft class both of whom were going to be long gone by the time the #8 pick came around.    That left very few options.

I'll admit I was part of that and I was dead wrong.  At that time, I thought Matt Rhule knew what he was doing, and Teddy was a scrub.  It turns out, Teddy knew what he was talking about and Matt Rhule is the scrub.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

Incompetence. The film was there it does not matter what you think he might do. The Jets giving up on him should have been the biggest red flag. All involved should be on the hottest of seats. And I didn't see much love of the game after that awful pick six against the Patriots as he casually walked to the bench and relaxed like nothing happened. That's the guy you guaranteed 19 million dollars to before even seeing him play in person.

If I hated or didn't care about football and was getting paid millions to play it, I'd say I love it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'll admit I was part of that and I was dead wrong.  At that time, I thought Matt Rhule knew what he was doing, and Teddy was a scrub.  It turns out, Teddy knew what he was talking about and Matt Rhule is the scrub.

That was completely understandable mistake.  The Panthers overperformed in 2020, despite only having 5 wins.  2 would have been about what most of us expected.

What none of us knew was that Rhule chiming in was not about sticking up for Brady, but his own insecurity or narcissism. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

That was completely understandable mistake.  The Panthers overperformed in 2020, despite only having 5 wins.  2 would have been about what most of us expected.

What none of us knew was that Rhule chiming in was not about sticking up for Brady, but his own insecurity or narcissism. 

I really believed Matt Rhule was a good hire in year 1, but this was basically me watching the team this year during the Giants game.

spacer.png

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'll admit I was part of that and I was dead wrong.  At that time, I thought Matt Rhule knew what he was doing, and Teddy was a scrub.  It turns out, Teddy knew what he was talking about and Matt Rhule is the scrub.

Teddy is good enough to build a team around. His problem is the clutch game winning drives, but he will be solid for a team with a great defense.

I group Teddy with QBs like Kerry Collins, Trent Dilfer, Ryan Tannehill, Jimmy Garoppolo, and Ryan Fitzpatrick.

You can win with them, but you won't win because of them. So, coaches who play for the final drive of a game will never be a fit for these QBs.

Darnold is a potential project with no known upside and an inability to keep his poise in the pocket, which leads to the team doubting his every throw and adjustment.

Teddy was the Panthers Goff/Garoppolo. Not their fault coaches would put them in a situation for a game winning drive which they have proven they can't do. Build the team around them and then find the rare QB that can will their team with precision on the final drive of the game.

Teddy will be in the league for some time if he stays healthy. Darnold will retire early.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teddy will get a very good team into the playoffs, and then get bounced. That's his ceiling. He can game manage and beat bad teams, but don't ask him to beat a top QB on a good team.

Sam doesn't see open receivers, often the first read, and so he shouldn't be able to ever help a team to a winning season. Not to mention his deep ball just sails off to nowhere, or into the hands of the defense.

Cousins and Jimmy G can make the SB if you drag them there with MEGA-teams loaded at nearly every position. You need a once per decade type WONDER team with the best roster in the NFL for Jimmy and Cousins to try and win it all.

We already know what is out there in free agency, and the instant we land a new QB we'll know our fate. That's how heavily QBs decide the outcomes in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

I saw it before. I'll say it again. 

That scouting room is filled with YES men and desperation. They all show doubt in their voices, body language, and rhetoric. They talked themselves into the Darnold acquisition.

No one is filling the role of devils advocate. A championship roster is built on knowing what you don't want, and not by piling up all the potential positives. Anyone who can be drafted or compete for a roster spot has potential.

Not one of them mentioned leadership, competitive nature, or game winning ability at the NFL level.

Fire everyone in that room.

The video is edited. Any of those Devil's advocate comments wouldn't have been included.

Rhule has final say. He said go get Darnold. The video was made to hype the move to the fans.

Edited by trueblade
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I really believed Matt Rhule was a good hire in year 1, but this was basically me watching the team this year during the Giants game.

spacer.png

Most of us did, me included.  He was a breath of fresh air after seeing the same game plans every week and speeches about missed opportunities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

Teddy is good enough to build a team around. His problem is the clutch game winning drives, but he will be solid for a team with a great defense.

Broncos had a great defense and Teddy still failed. He is not a player "you can build a team around". He is a backup not a starter, but people in the NFL keep making him a starter. You can't win with a QB like him in todays NFL unless you have a historically great defense. Like the 2015 Broncos.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...