Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers now have an offensive asst. to give defensive insights to the offense ......


GRWatcher
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Isnt his role to just scout the offense from a defensive perspective?

 

His role is to scout the offense, and tell them what signs they are showing, tells, or repetitive play calls. McVay, Shanahan, and BB do this same thing for their offenses. 

I have no problem with doing this. The choice of hire is the issue. It isn't a former pro linebacker. It's a guy who maxed out in college. 

It's another coach at a pro level without pro experience. We should have learned our lesson.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

I have no problem with doing this. The choice of hire is the issue. It isn't a former pro linebacker. It's a guy who maxed out in college. 

It's another coach at a pro level without pro experience. We should have learned our lesson.

If you look down the list of assistants that we have at this level, I'm sure you'll notice a trend.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

I have no problem with doing this. The choice of hire is the issue. It isn't a former pro linebacker. It's a guy who maxed out in college. 

It's another coach at a pro level without pro experience. We should have learned our lesson.

If his job is to look at player tendencies, why does it matter how good he was at football? Was BB one of the best players in football history? how about Sean McVay? Sean McDermott? 

 

You dont have to be athletic to see tendencies or decisions on the field decisions. poo we do it here, and get it right at least 50% of the time...

  • Pie 6
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

If his job is to look at player tendencies, why does it matter how good he was at football? Was BB one of the best players in football history? how about Sean McVay? Sean McDermott? 

 

You dont have to be athletic to see tendencies or decisions on the field decisions. poo we do it here, and get it right at least 50% of the time...

It's not about athleticism. It's about experience at the pro level. It matters and he doesn't have it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PanthersGTI said:

I mean like.....we are bitching about an offensive assistant like this guy is going to be in there making up part of a game plan or something...... y'all need to relax. 

It shows that they are still looking in the wrong places for answers and that they are still fundamentally flawed in their management of the team. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

It shows that they are still looking in the wrong places for answers and that they are still fundamentally flawed in their management of the team. 

Realistically speaking, these guys are just interns that somebody's giving a chance to try and get their foot in the door.

Some of them may succeed. Most won't.

But as to the point that the team and its leadership are fundamentally flawed? Yeah, they are (no doubt).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Realistically speaking, these guys are just interns that somebody's giving a chance to try and get their foot in the door.

Some of them may succeed. Most won't.

But as to the point that the team and its leadership are fundamentally flawed? Yeah, they are (no doubt).

Yeah, I don't think that this is a crucial position, but just the fact that they keep fishing in that same pond is a problem.

And fishing from that same pond won't help. It's a waste of resources and convolutes things further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On any staff besides ours this would be an absolute nothing move.  No one would even note it.  Of no importance whatsoever.

With our staff so far beyond the pale however, any move is like salt in the wounds at this point.  Nothing they do will be right.  Only a massive turnaround will rescue them, and with our cap and draft capital the correct resources to create that just aren't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...