Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Waldman's RSP Film Room: Carson Strong


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

It's college. The strong arm QBs can force balls in at that level. Coverage is much tighter at the NFL level and you can 3x his ints if he keeps making those throws.

As for him throwing open receivers, please reference the game he regularly does this. I see that a majority of his throws are behind the receiver, underthrown, wobblers, or floaters. He has no touch. His receivers need to constantly adjust to his throws, and it is obvious they recruited receivers with a large catch radius because of his inaccuracy. He gets his receivers killed often.

He is at the bottom of the top 15 when it comes to throwing a WR open.

This was even more obvious in the Senior Bowl.

So the guys analysis in the op and others are garbage and Strong is garbage while out performing most of the pack playing and hurt. He didn't want to let his team down. High character. He risked everything for them and put up better numbers than your guys and beautiful tape.

If anybody can adjust to the NFL game and the speed it's a high IQ, strong armed, great reader of defenses like this guy. 

The guy couldn't plant his back leg and threw a couple wobbles and STILL played better than the top of this QB Class with two 70% seasons in a row but that means nothing, right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

So the guys analysis in the op and others are garbage and Strong is garbage while out performing most of the pack playing and hurt. He didn't want to let his team down. High character. He risked everything for them and put up better numbers than your guys and beautiful tape.

If anybody can adjust to the NFL game and the speed it's a high IQ, strong armed, great reader of defenses like this guy. 

The guy couldn't plant his back leg and threw a couple wobbles and STILL played better than the top of this QB Class with two 70% seasons in a row but that means nothing, right. 

Not defending the dude you're responding to but Scot's thread is interesting about Strong not interviewing well with teams at the combine.  Seems like Corral also doesn't leave the best impressions.  Doesn't help their cases but I do see Strong as the best pure passer in the class.  I just wouldn't get any hopes up he'll be coming here.  I think we're obviously a trade, Mariota-level signing or Willis/Pickett at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rippadonn said:

So the guys analysis in the op and others are garbage and Strong is garbage while out performing most of the pack playing and hurt. He didn't want to let his team down. High character. He risked everything for them and put up better numbers than your guys and beautiful tape.

If anybody can adjust to the NFL game and the speed it's a high IQ, strong armed, great reader of defenses like this guy. 

The guy couldn't plant his back leg and threw a couple wobbles and STILL played better than the top of this QB Class with two 70% seasons in a row but that means nothing, right. 

So, you can't give me a single game to watch him throw open receivers consistently?

Did you watch the entire film analysis? If you did, I'm sure you caught the part where he points out they had to throw ONE bad pass in the analysis? That alone red flags the analysis. It's clear he is fan boying about Carson Strong, and claiming his bad decisions are amazing throws.

I run from strong arm fan boys' analysis of a QB. The best coaches in the NFL even point this out in books about arm strength being a huge problem with the draft/combine process.

Lance Zierlein has Strong graded lower than Jack Coan. He refers to Coan as a back up/possible starter. He only refers to Strong as a back-up. While I'm not a fan of Zierlein, he does agree with me on many of the negatives surrounding Strong in his scouting report. He believes Coan will go 4th round while Strong goes 2nd round and may sneak into the 1st. This is what happens when personnel execs fall in love with strong arms QBs. They reach for them, even with 2 bum knees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, davos said:

Not defending the dude you're responding to but Scot's thread is interesting about Strong not interviewing well with teams at the combine.  Seems like Corral also doesn't leave the best impressions.  Doesn't help their cases but I do see Strong as the best pure passer in the class.  I just wouldn't get any hopes up he'll be coming here.  I think we're obviously a trade, Mariota-level signing or Willis/Pickett at this point.

I've read numerous quotes from NFL scouts & execs that all said interviews are maybe the most important part of the Combine (along with the medical).  

Finding out that Corral and Strong both did poorly is a surprise.  Not only is the position an intellectual one, where you have to read the defense on every snap.  You also have to be the leader of grown men who are already millionaires and who have kids.  So you need a leader in the huddle and in the locker room.   Not some immature kid.  

I think poor interviews bode very badly for Strong and Carrol.  And conversely, Pickett did very well which helps his stock.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rippadonn said:

So the guys analysis in the op and others are garbage and Strong is garbage while out performing most of the pack playing and hurt. He didn't want to let his team down. High character. He risked everything for them and put up better numbers than your guys and beautiful tape.

If anybody can adjust to the NFL game and the speed it's a high IQ, strong armed, great reader of defenses like this guy. 

The guy couldn't plant his back leg and threw a couple wobbles and STILL played better than the top of this QB Class with two 70% seasons in a row but that means nothing, right. 

So what’s your take on Strong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nfl is 17 games, plus preseason, plus OTAs, plus working everyday. We don’t have to talk about post season as the Panthers won’t see that with Rhule here 

Point being, the physical toil is enormous and let’s be truthful, every defensive player in the league knows about that injury    

far or not, that injury makes him too much risk unless it’s 5th rd.  A team with a decent starter might pick him earlier but I just don’t see him surviving the nfl for long 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...