Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One by One they go off the board


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Yea too bad we missed out on Christian Kirk for 84m. 

 

Kirk deal is nuts.  Also, Cedric Wilson 3yrs/22m.  Free agency is about not doing stupid things just to do something and finding the best deals left after the initial wave of craziness.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Plus good veterans aren't gonna want to come here. Also, if you haven't noticed a trend, Rhule doesn't like veterans.

I don’t these these vets care where they go if the money is right. Schreff went to the Jags and Tomlinson to the Jets which haven’t been the most stable franchises. We are just hanging around waiting for Watson like dumb asses….

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t these these vets care where they go if the money is right. Schreff went to the Jags and Tomlinson to the Jets which haven’t been the most stable franchises. We are just hanging around waiting for Watson like dumb asses….

Trying to think of the last great day 1 fa signing that changed a team.. drawing a blank.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Trying to think of the last great day 1 fa signing that changed a team.. drawing a blank.

Chiefs signed Thuney last year because they were serious about repairing their OL. If you want a great OL you are going to have to pay for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Plus good veterans aren't gonna want to come here. Also, if you haven't noticed a trend, Rhule doesn't like veterans.

That's not QUITE true.  Rhule doesn't like veterans . . . except HIS veterans.  Nothing else could explain the OLine situation as it relates to Brown and Christiansen this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t these these vets care where they go if the money is right. Schreff went to the Jags and Tomlinson to the Jets which haven’t been the most stable franchises. We are just hanging around waiting for Watson like dumb asses….

There is a difference between guys chasing money and guys chasing success.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The argument is that you have to protect the QB. I think they did a good job of pointing that out.

No one is arguing against that. It’s more a question of whether it’s worth a $40M contract on day one when you can get solid guards for about 1/8 of that commitment. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...