Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ncstatekwi said:

I find it interesting there is very very little to no coverage of Deshaun Watson on ESPN or NFL.COM.  I wonder if they are making a statement here.  There is definitely a lot of TB12 TB12 TB12....hmmmmm.....

They definitely are...  I said the same thing yesterday.  When we have been the frontrunner, the national media dies down to a whisper.  When another team seemed to be getting in the driver's seat, they were frothing at the mouth to tweet, retweet, and report.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

They definitely are...  I said the same thing yesterday.  When we have been the frontrunner, the national media dies down to a whisper.  When another team seemed to be getting in the driver's seat, they were frothing at the mouth to tweet, retweet, and report.

Very Very Very interesting....hmm...I have a lot of theories....but it is extremely odd...even on ESPN and FS1 yesterday...its either all about how the LAKERS stink poo or TB12....whispers about WATSON...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

There’s no way he’s going to the Browns. He could play in Charlotte or NO but chooses Cleveland? Nah. His agent is forcing that meeting because he owes the GM or something…

...Actually, If he wants to win, CLE is the spot with all the supporting cast. They only need a qb to make a push to get to the next level.  If he wants to wallow in sht for four years come here or go to NO....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncguy2184 said:

Anything panthers related and it's a ghost town on all the major networks it's always been this way. 

EXCEPT when we make the Superbowl they have to kinda talk about us for a week. 

 

Not if there is something negative to report. We took over every media outlet when Hardy had his scandal. Round the clock Panthers coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Not if there is something negative to report. We took over every media outlet when Hardy had his scandal. Round the clock Panthers coverage.

Yeah true, also when cam would do the post game interviews when we lost and he would kinda pout because he wasn't acting happy enough for ESPN after a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncguy2184 said:

Yeah true, also when cam would do the post game interviews when we lost and he would kinda pout because he wasn't acting happy enough for ESPN after a loss.

And if we do too well all the sports media outlets will repeat the same line "worst 12-0, 13-0 ect team of all time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I do want us to get Watson because I believe you need a QB in today's NFL to win, BUT only thing is if we do happen to get Watson does that mean no matter how this up coming season goes we will have another year after this one of Matt Rhule? Say Watson misses 6 games and we miss the playoffs will Tepper give Rhule one more prove it year? 

 

I really want us to get Watson BAD! I think he is a top 4 QB but Matt Rhule is #32 Head Coach and needs to be shown the door he should have been fired before the end of the season last year.

 

Matt Rhule is PURE GARBAGE and I'm scared that he may be the reason we don't get Watson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...