Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

have you accepted that sam darnold is the week 1 starter yet?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

Correction 4th round.

This year second round. Every other year he'd be a 4th round guy. I just really don't like any of them and would rather we use our first round on OL. I don't expect much from 4th rounders and beyond. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rayzor said:

This year second round. Every other year he'd be a 4th round guy. I just really don't like any of them and would rather we use our first round on OL. I don't expect much from 4th rounders and beyond. 

I've been saying it forever.

Roll with Sam the way we should have rolled with Grier. 

Either he kicks ass or we get the 1st pick. No more middle of the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I've been saying it forever.

Roll with Sam the way we should have rolled with Grier. 

Either he kicks ass or we get the 1st pick. No more middle of the road.

Sam sucks, but he's the penance that this franchise must pay for our (well, Rhule's) mistakes and errors of judgement.

I don't want us to intentionally tank. I don't want us to lose. I just think that it's going to happen naturally. My eyes are on 2023 when we've hopefully moved on from Rhule, but have shored up the OL and can score us a true franchise QB.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure he will be here. Cam's probably out even if they want him to come back. So it's PJ and  Sam, but that's only if they can't manage to sign some else. So they are going to be signing more than one qb is suppose.  Hell I don't know but it's hilarious to watch Tepper eat a bag of dicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...